Systematic Literature Review of Multimodal Classroom Discourse Analysis: An SF-MDA Perspective

  • Wan Dong Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mazlin Azizan Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Puspalata C Suppiah Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Keywords: Systemic Functional-Multimodal Discourse Analysis (SF-MDA), Semiotic resources, Classroom discourse, Meanings

Abstract

Multimodal classroom discourse analysis is critical for understanding how diverse semiotic resources interplay in shaping teaching and learning experiences. This study conducted a systematic review to explore the current status of classroom discourse analysis through the lens of Systemic Functional-Multimodal Discourse Analysis (SF-MDA). It aims to analyze the application of SF-MDA in classroom settings and identify future research directions. The review employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) method, using keywords in Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Articles were selected based on strict criteria, including publication dates between 2016 and 2024, focusing on multimodal analysis in classroom contexts. A total of 25 studies from 13 countries were included for detailed analysis. The findings reveal that SF-MDA has been instrumental in uncovering how various semiotic modes—such as gestures, spatial arrangements, and digital tools—interact to construct meanings in classrooms. Despite a predominance of qualitative methodologies, there is a growing trend toward mixed-method designs to systematically assess multimodal teaching effectiveness. Future research can address existing gaps by incorporating quantitative methods, refining analytical tools, and exploring emerging digital modalities to further enhance the understanding of multimodal classroom discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelrahim, A. A. (2024). Semiotic modes accentuating learners’ metafunctions: The systemic functional approach to multimodal discourse analysis. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 42(2), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2023.2229383

Adami, E. (2016). Introducing multimodality. The Oxford handbook of language and society. Oxford University Press.

Alyousef, H. S. (2020). A multimodal discourse analysis of English dentistry texts written by Saudi undergraduate students: A study of theme and information structure. Open Linguistics, 6(1), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0103

Amundrud, T. (2018). Applying multimodal research to the tertiary foreign language classroom: Looking at gaze. In H. de Silva Joyce & S. Feez (Eds.), Multimodality across classrooms (pp. 160–177). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203701072

Amundrud, T. (2022). Multimodal knowledge building in a Japanese secondary English as a foreign language class. Multimodality & Society, 2(1), 64-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795221081300

Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimodal toolkit and coursebook. University of Toronto Press.

Bateman, J. (2008). Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Springer.

Bateman, J. (2014). Using multimodal corpora for multimodal research. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 238–252). Routledge.

Bezemer, J., & Jewitt, C. (2010). Multimodal analysis: Key issues. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 180–197). Continuum.

Björkvall, A., & Karlsson, A. M. (2011). The materiality of discourses and the semiotics of materials: A social perspective on the meaning potentials of written texts and furniture. Semiotica, 187(1/4), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.068

Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2013). Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 47(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016

Danielsson, K. (2016). Modes and meaning in the classroom–the role of different semiotic resources to convey meaning in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 35, 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.005

Erfanian Mohammadi, J., Elahi Shirvan, M., & Akbari, O. (2019). Systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis of teaching students developing classroom materials. Teaching in higher Education, 24(8), 964-986. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1527763

Farsani, D., & Mendes, J. R. (2023). Multimodal classroom discourse: gestures and proxemics in teacher-student interaction. Educar em Revista, 39. https://doi. org/10.1590/1984-0411.75958

Feng, H. (2021). A Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis of English Micro-lectures. Journal of Higher Education Research, 2(5), 293-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.32629/jher.v2i5.508

Fernández-Fontecha, A., O’Halloran, K. L., Wignell, P., & Tan, S. (2020). Scaffolding CLIL in the science classroom via visual thinking: A systemic functional multimodal approach. Linguistics and Education, 55, 100788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100788

Hafner, C. (2024). Multimodal discourse analysis and second language research. In C. Hafner (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and discourse (pp. 24–37). Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Harrigan, J. A. (2013). Methodology: Coding and studying nonverbal behavior. In J. A. Hall & M. L. Knapp (Eds.), Nonverbal communication (pp. 35–68). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238150.35

Herman, S., Ngongo, M., Fatmawati, E., & Saputra, N. (2023). An analysis on multimodal discourse analysis towards English textbook used by students at school. Journal of Namibian Studies, 33, 613-624.

Heng, B. C. (2017). A Multimodal Analysis of Interpersonal Meaning in Chinese as a Second Language Classrooms [Doctoral thesis, University of Malaya].

Heng, B. C. (2021). Enhancing learning through the multimodal teaching approach in Chinese-as-a-second-language classrooms. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 20-46.

Hood, S. E. (2011). Body language in face-to-face teaching: A focus on textual and interpersonal meaning. In E. A. Thompson, M. Stenglin, & S. Dreyfus (Eds.), Semiotic margins: Meaning in multimodalities (pp. 31–52). Continuum.

Huang, A., & Ma, Y. (2024). ELAN-Based Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Teachers’ Talk: A Case Study of EFL Teachers in China. Education Reform and Development, 6(3), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.26689/erd.v6i3.6647

Jewitt, C. (2008). Technology, literacy and learning: a multimodal approach. London: Routledge.

Jewitt, C. (2012). Technology, literacy, learning: A multimodal approach. Routledge.

Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodality and digital technologies in the classroom. In I. Saint-Georges & J. J. Weber (Eds.), Multilingualism and multimodality: The future of education research (pp. 141–152). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-266-2_8

Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J. & O’Halloran, K. L. (2016). Introducing Multimodality. London and New York: Routledge.

Kim, D., Yatsu, D. K., & Li, Y. (2021). A multimodal model for analyzing middle school English language learners’ digital stories. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100067

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality–A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London and New York: Routledge.

Kress, G. (2015). Semiotic work: Applied linguistics and a social semiotic account of multimodality. Aila Review, 28(1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.03kre

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The grammar of visual design. London and New York: Routledge.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images. London: Routledge.

Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K. and Reid, E. (2005). English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge.

Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.

Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100303

Lim, F. V. (2018). Developing a systemic functional approach to teach multimodal literacy. Functional Linguistics, 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0066-8

Lim, V. F. (2021a). Designing Learning with Embodied Teaching: Perspectives from Multimodality. London & New York: Routledge.

Lim, F. V. (2021b). Investigating intersemiosis: A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis of the relationship between language and gesture in classroom discourse. Visual Communication, 20(1), 34-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218820695

Lim, F. V., & Tan, K. Y. S. (2017). Multimodal translational research: Teaching visual texts. In O. Seizov & J. Wildfeuer (Eds.), New studies in multimodality: Conceptual and methodological elaborations (pp. 175–200). Bloomsbury.

Lim, F. V., & Toh, W. (2022). Design considerations for digital learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. In S. Tan & K. L. Marissa (Eds.), Discourses, modes, media and meaning in an era of pandemic: A multimodal discourse analysis approach (pp. 69–88). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168195-7

Lim, F. V., O’Halloran, K. L., & Podlasov, A. (2012). Spatial pedagogy: Mapping meanings in the use of classroom space. Cambridge journal of education, 42(2), 235-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.676629

Lim, V. F. (2011). A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis approach to pedagogic discourse [Doctoral thesis, National University of Singapore].

Lim, V. F. (2019). Analysing the teachers’ use of gestures in the classroom: A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis approach. Social Semiotics, 29(1), 83-111. https://doi/abs/10.1080/10350330.2017.1412168

Lim, V. F., & Tan, S. K. Y. (2018). Developing multimodal literacy through teaching the critical viewing of films in Singapore. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.882

Lindenberg, D. (2023). Logico-semantic relations between spoken text and slides’ visual elements in student presentations conducted online in the English as a Foreign Language context. Visual Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572231180215

Liu, Z. (2022). Introducing a multimodal perspective to emotional variables in second language acquisition education: Systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1016441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016441

Macken-Horarik, M. (2004). Interacting with the multimodal text: Reflections on image and verbiage in art express. Visual communication, 3(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357204039596

Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the “digital society.” In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (Vol. 30, pp. 151–175). Peter Lang.

Martin, J. R. (2002) Meaning beyond the clause: SFL perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, (22), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.34711

Martinec, R. (2000). Types of process in action. Semiotica, 130, 243–268. https://doi:10.1515/semi.2000.130.3-4.243

Martinec, R. (2001). Interpersonal resources in action. Semiotica, 135, 117–145. https://doi:10.1515/semi.2001.056

Martinec, R. (2005). Topics in multimodality. In R. Hasan, C. M. Matthiessen, & J. J. Webster (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective (pp. 157–181). University of Toronto Press.

Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016

Morell, T. (2018). Multimodal competence and effective interactive lecturing. System, 77, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.12.006

Morell, T., Beltrán-Palanques, V., & Norte, N. (2022). A multimodal analysis of pair work engagement episodes: Implications for EMI lecturer training. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 58, 101124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101124

Mustofa, M. I., Riswanto, R., & Putra, P. P. (2023). Teachers’ orchestration of semiotic resources in EFL classrooms: A multimodal analysis. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 13(2), 552-580. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v13i2.6912

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.

O’Halloran, K. L. (1996). The discourse of secondary school mathematics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Murdoch University.

O’Halloran, K. L. (2004). Discourse in secondary school Mathematics classrooms according to social class and gender. In J. A. Foley (Ed.), Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches (191-225). London & New York: Continuum.

O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication, 7(4), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357208096210

O’Halloran, K. L., & Lim, F. V. (2011). Dimensions of multimodal literacy. Viden om læsning (Knowledge about Reading), 10, 14-21.

O'Halloran, K. L., & Lim, F. (2014). Systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis. In S. Norris & C. D. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, images and texts: A reader in multimodality (pp. 137–153). Mouton de Gruyter.

O'Toole, M. (1994). The language of displayed art. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press.

Peng, J. E. (2019). The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communicate in English. System, 82, 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.006

Peng, J. E., Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2016). The mediation of multimodal affordances on willingness to communicate in the English as a foreign language classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 51(2), 302-331. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.298

Poulsen, S. V., & Kvåle, G. (2018). Studying social media as semiotic technology: a social semiotic multimodal framework. Social semiotics, 28(5), 700-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1505689

Qin, Y., & Wang, P. (2021). How EFL teachers engage students: a multimodal analysis of pedagogic discourse during classroom lead-ins. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 793495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.793495

Ravelli, L. J., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Modality in the digital age. Visual communication, 17(3), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218764436

Saeed, A., & Shaikh, N. Z. (2024). Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Classroom Oral Presentations at Tertiary Level. Sindh Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.58921/sjl.v3i1.59

Salmani, S., & Rahimi, M. (2024). Does Multimodality Add to the Value of L2 Listening Homework? A Mixed-Methods Study of Comprehension and Cognitive Load. English Teaching & Learning, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-024-00181-0

Samuelsson, R., Price, S., & Jewitt, C. (2022). How pedagogical relations in early years settings are reconfigured by interactive touchscreens. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13152

Shin, D. S., Cimasko, T., & Yi, Y. (2020). Development of metalanguage for multimodal composing: A case study of an L2 writer’s design of multimedia texts. Journal of second language writing, 47, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100714

Tan, S., O’Halloran, K. L., & Wignell, P. (2016). Multimodal research: Addressing the complexity of multimodal environments and the challenges for CALL. ReCALL, 28(3), 253-273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000124

Taylor, R. (2016). The multimodal texture of engagement: Prosodic language, gaze and posture in engaged, creative classroom interaction. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.04.001

Toh, W., & Lim, F. V. (2021). Using video games for learning: Developing a metalanguage for digital play. Games and Culture, 16(5), 583-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412020921339

Twiner, A., Littleton, K., Whitelock, D., & Coffin, C. (2021). Combining sociocultural discourse analysis and multimodal analysis to explore teachers' and pupils' meaning making. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100520

Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Unsworth, L., & Mills, K. A. (2020). English language teaching of attitude and emotion in digital multimodal composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100712

Van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Speech, music, sound. Palgrave Macmillan.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2015). Multimodality. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 447–465). John Wiley & Sons.

Ventola, E., Charles, C., & Kaltenbacher, M. (Eds.). (2004). Perspectives on multimodality. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Vrabel, M. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Oncology Nursing Forum, 42(5), 552-554. https://doi.org/10.1188/15.ONF.552-554

Yunita, W., Abdullah, F., Mellan, M., Hidayati, A. N., & Ardi, H. (2022). Managing English young learners’ classroom activities through gestures: a multimodal perspective. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(4), 2962-2973. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i4.2007

Zhang, D. L. (2015). Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Theory and Application in EFL Classroom Teaching. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

Published
2025-05-23
Section
Articles