Penggunaan AI Gemini dalam Pendidikan Alam Sekitar di Sekolah Menengah: Satu Kajian Kes di Klang
Abstract
Penggunaan AI Gemini dalam Pendidikan Alam Sekitar memerlukan pendekatan pedagogi yang sesuai bagi menyokong pembelajaran bermakna dan berkesan. Kajian ini bertujuan menilai keberkesanan penggunaan AI Gemini dalam Pendidikan Alam Sekitar di sebuah sekolah menengah di Klang. Pendekatan kualitatif dengan reka bentuk kajian kes digunakan melibatkan empat orang guru dan empat orang pelajar. Data dikumpul melalui temu bual separa berstruktur, pemerhatian bilik darjah dan analisis dokumen serta dianalisis secara tematik. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa penggunaan AI Gemini berpotensi memperibadikan pembelajaran, meningkatkan kefahaman konsep, penglibatan dan kreativiti pelajar. Walau bagaimanapun, cabaran seperti kekangan kemahiran digital dan ketepatan maklumat turut dikenal pasti. Kajian ini menegaskan keperluan latihan guru, bimbingan pedagogi dan garis panduan etika bagi memastikan integrasi AI Gemini yang berkesan dalam Pendidikan Alam Sekitar di sekolah menengah.
Downloads
References
Abdul Malek, M. (2016). Environmental education in Malaysian schools: Issues and challenges. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Press.
Ardyansyah, A., & Rahayu, S. (2023). Development and implementation of augmented reality-based card game learning media with environmental literacy in improving students’ understanding of carbon compounds. Orbital, 15(2), 118-126. https://doi.org/10.17807/orbital.v15i2.17617
Arici, F. (2024). Artificial intelligence and augmented reality integration in environmental learning. Computers & Education, 215, 104121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2310921
Arlingga Cahya, M. (2021). AI in remote learning: A post-pandemic analysis. Journal of Modern Education Review, 11(9), 890–903.
Arvola, M., Edfors Fuchs, I., Nyman, I., & Szczepanski, A. (2021). Mobile augmented reality and outdoor education. Built Environment, 47(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.47.2.223
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Comparative case studies: An innovative approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1(1), 5–17. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.7577%2Fnjcie.1929?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19
Berita Harian. (2017, January 12). Pendidikan alam sekitar perlu diperkasa di sekolah.
Bit, S., Biswas, R., & Nag, D. (2024). Data security and ethical concerns in AI-based education systems. AI Ethics Review, 5(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2411424
Chang, C. H., & Kidman, G. (2023). The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) language models: Challenges and opportunities for geographical and environmental education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Geography Education, 51(2), 120–135. DOI:10.1080/10382046.2023.2194036
Chen, H., Huang, X., & Zhang, L. (2010). AI applications in Malaysian educational contexts. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4690–4694.
Chua, C. P., & Valencia, L. D. (2020, August). The role of artificial intelligence in education amidst the COVID‑19 pandemic. Paper presented at the ICPSR Conference. Diambil dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343691393_The_Role_of_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Education_Amidst_of_the_COVID-19_Pandemic
Cojocariu, V. M., Lazar, I., & Butnaru, G. (2014). E-learning and distance education in pandemic times. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 426–432.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
de‑Lima‑Santos, M.‑F., & Ceron, W. (2021). Artificial intelligence in news media: Current perceptions and future outlook. Journal. Media, 3(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3010002
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Domenico, S., Russo, R., & Cimini, M. (2021). AI for sustainable education: A conceptual framework. Sustainability, 13(12), 6654.
Fauville, G., Lantz‑Andersson, A., & Säljö, R. (2014). ICT tools in environmental education: Reviewing two newcomers to schools. Environmental Education Research, 20(2), 248–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.775220
Felix, U. (2020). Teachers vs AI: Debating the future of the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(3), 245–262.
Fink, A. (2006). How to conduct surveys. SAGE Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Prentice Hall.
Hammersley, M. (2004). Towards a usable past for qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570310001640581
Hancock, D. R., Algozzine, B., & Lim, J. H. (2021). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hara, K. (2023). Reforming environmental curriculum through AI and digital tools. Educational Research International, 15(2), 113–128.
Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.1.2655
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Holmes, W., Park, C., & Tan, C. (2022). Vygotsky in the age of AI: Reimagining the zone of proximal development. Computers & Education, 185, 104183.
Hua, A. K. (2016). Pengenalan rangkakerja metodologi dalam kajian penyelidikan: Satu kajian literatur. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 17–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v1i2.8
Imran, A., & Almusharraf, N. (2024). Google Gemini as a next generation AI educational tool: A review of emerging educational technology. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00310-z
Isaac, J. (2004). Chalk and talk: The decline of interactive pedagogy. Asian Journal of Education, 24(3), 43–56.
Jasmi, K. A. (2012). Metodologi pengumpulan data dalam penyelidikan kualitatif. In Kertas kerja dibentangkan dalam Kursus Penyelidikan Kualitatif (pp. 28–29). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Puteri Resort Melaka.
Karim, A., Sandu, R., & Gide, E. (2020). AI and cognitive learning enhancement in schools. International Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(4), 102–118.
Khan, F., Ahmad, A., & Rahim, M. (2022). Machine learning applications in personalized learning. Educational AI Review, 2(1), 89–102.
Khan, A. H., Marlina, A., & Cahyadi, A. (2024). Effectiveness of lecture results via the Klipaa.Id application on environmental education class students in the era of artificial intelligence. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma Negara, 16(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.37640/jip.v16i2.2137
Larsen, L., & Azizi, N. (2000). Environmental education in Denmark and Malaysia: A comparative study. Environmental Education Research, 6(3), 241–255.
Lee, J. (2021). AI for differentiated learning: Personalization in secondary schools. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 22(6), 945–961.
Lee, K. (2022). Programming AI sensors for environmental monitoring in schools. STEM Education Journal, 9(2), 201–217.
Liao, Y., & Li, C. (2019). Interactive environmental learning models. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 76(5), 789–805.
Łodzikowski, M., Baran, M., & Gajda, P. (2023). Ethical regulation in artificial intelligence systems. AI Policy Review, 11(4), 301–319.
Magaldi, D., & Berler, M. (2020). Semi-structured interviews. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3
Mamta, S., & Dhiman, P. (2022). Environmental education and pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability Education Review, 4(1), 33–48.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction. European Journal of General Practice, 23(1), 271–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090
Nabiyev, V. (2010). Artificial intelligence: Foundations and applications. Springer.
Nguyen, H., Nguyen, V., Ludovise, S., & Santagata, R. (2025). Value‑sensitive design of chatbots in environmental education: Supporting identity, connectedness, well‑being and sustainability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56 1370–1390. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13568
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nyaaba, D. (2023). Google Gemini in education: A new frontier for AI-enhanced teaching. Journal of Educational Innovation and Practice, 17(3), 65–78.
Pantelimon, F.-V., Bologa, R., Toma, A., & Posedaru, B.-S. 2021. The Evolution of AI-Driven Educational Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability. 13(23): 13501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313501
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge.
Pu, S., Tan, E., & Lin, J. (2021). AI-driven flexible learning models. Educational Technology Research Journal, 7(4), 331–348.
Reshmi, R. K., Joseph, B., Antony, R. V., & Krishnakumar, K. S. (2024). Environmental education with artificial intelligence tutoring systems. Madhya Bharti - Humanities and Social Sciences, 85(4), 170–176.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, C. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Rupert, M. (2024). The importance of qualitative research. https://amg-research.com/the-importance-of-qualitative-research/
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Saeidnia, S. (2023). Personalized learning through AI assistants: Case study of Gemini. Technology in Education Review, 14(2), 91–108.
Sanatora, L. (2003). Limitations of traditional teaching methods in environmental education. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 4(2), 203–210
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business. John Wiley & Sons.
Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
Symon, G., & Cassell, C. (2014). Qualitative research. In C. Pope & N. Mays (Eds.), Qualitative research in health care (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Telkom University. (2025). What is Gemini AI? https://it.telkomuniversity.ac.id/en/what-is-gemini-ai/
Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainable development: An expert review. UNESCO.
Uddin, M. R., Shimizu, K., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2020). Assessing secondary level students’ critical thinking skills: Inspiring environmental education for achieving sustainable development goals. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(2), 022043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022043
United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Emissions gap report 2021. UNEP. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2021
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
van de Wetering, J., Leijten, P., Spitzer, J., & Thomaes, S. (2022). Does environmental education benefit environmental outcomes in children and adolescents? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101782
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wardani, E. (2018). Traditional teaching methods and student motivation in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 8(4), 331–341.
Wartman, S., & Combs, C. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of education. Perspectives in Education, 36(2), 89–104.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Yarkandi, A. H. (2012). Strengthening environmental education in school curricula. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 3(8), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v3i8.77
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Young, K. (2024). Pedagogical transformation through AI in education. International Journal of Innovative Education, 19(2), 144–160.
Zamri Mahamod, & Nor Razah Lim. (2011). Kepelbagaian kaedah penyoalan lisan dalam pengajaran guru Bahasa Melayu: Kaedah pemerhatian. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu (MyLEJ), 1(1), 51–65. Retrieved from http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2540/1/51-65_Jurnal_pendidikan_bahasa_melayu.pdf
