Disciplinary Dynamics: A Comparative Study of Move Structures in Research Discussions
Abstract
This study investigates the move structures employed in the research discussions of articles across academic disciplines, particularly science and non-science, focusing on the dynamics that shape disciplinary conventions. Based on a comparative analysis of selected articles from two distinct fields, this study aims to uncover how researchers in these fields discuss their research results, such as by articulating their findings, engaging with existing literature, and constructing arguments within their respective contexts. Through a qualitative content analysis approach, prevalent move structures were identified in the corpora, revealing both similarities and differences in the rhetorical strategies involved. Preliminary findings indicate that while certain move structures are universally recognised, each discipline exhibited unique patterns influenced by its academic conventions and discourse communities. These insights not only enhance our understanding of academic discourse but also highlight the importance of context in shaping research communication. The current findings essentially add to the growing body of knowledge on academic and research genre by providing a nuanced perspective on how move structures function as tools for the dissemination of knowledge. The implications extend to educators and researchers alike, offering guidance on effective writing practices that resonate with disciplinary norms. Ultimately, this comparative analysis fosters greater awareness of the complexities involved in research discussions, encouraging more effective and diverse cross-disciplinary research in the future.
Downloads
References
Amnuai, W. (2017). The textual organization of the discussion sections of accounting research articles. The Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.10.007
Amirian, Z., Kassaian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2008). Genre analysis: An investigation of the discussion sections of applied linguistics research articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 4(1), 39–63.
Amnuai, W., & Wannaruk, A. (2013). Investigating move structure of English applied linguistics research article discussions published in international and Thai journals. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p1
Almurashi, W.A. (2016). An introduction to Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 4(1), 70–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v4i1.9423
Al-Shujairi, Y.B. (2021). Review of the discussion section of research articles: Rhetorical structure and move. LSP International Journal, 8(2), 9–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v8.17099
Al-Shujairi, Y.B., & Al-Manaseer, F.A. (2022). Backgrounding the discussion section of medical research articles. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 12, 71–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2022.121008
Arsyad, S. (2013). A genre-based analysis on discussion section of research articles in Indonesian written by Indonesian speakers. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 50–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v5i4.3773
Arsyad, S., Zaim, M., Ramadhan, S., & Lubis, A.A. (2020). The argument style of research article discussions by non-native authors of English published in international journals. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature, 5, 193–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i2.11268
Azirah, H. (2005). Linguistic approaches to academic discourse. Bulletin, 5, 4–5.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144.
Belcher, W.L. (2009). Writing your journal article in twelve weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226500089.001.0001
Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034701
Bruce, I. (2009). Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 105–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.005
Candlin, C.N. (2000). General editor's preface. In K. Hyland (Ed.). Disciplinary discourse: social interactions in academic writing (pp. 15-21). Longman.
Charles, M. (2006). The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml021
Coffin, C., Curry, M. J., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T.M., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education. Routledge.
Dobakhti, L. (2016). A genre analysis of discussion sections of qualitative research articles in applied linguistics. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(7), 1383–1389. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0607.08
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (ed.). Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219-228). Routledge.
Flowerdew, J. (1999). Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 123–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80125-8
Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 121–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587862
Gao, S., & Pramoolsook, I. (2022). Move-step structure of the results and discussion section of electronic engineering research articles written by Chinese and Thai researchers. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(4), 725–739. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104725G
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press.
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5
Holmes, R. (2000). Variation and text structure: The discussion section in economics research articles. ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics, 131-132, 107-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/itl.131-132.06hol
Hüttner, J., Smit, U., & Mehlmauer-Larcher, B. (2009). ESP teacher education at the interface of theory and practice: Introducing a model of mediated corpus-based genre analysis. System, 37(1), 99–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.06.003
Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433–454.
Hyland, K. (1999a). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341
Hyland, K. (1999b). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.). Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99-121). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315840390-6
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1–23.
Jalilifar, A. (2011). World of attitudes in research article discussion sections: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Technology & Education, 5(3), 177–186.
Jaroongkhongdach, W., Todd, W.R., Keyuravong, S., & Hall, D. (2012). Differences in quality between Thai and international research articles in ELT. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 194–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.04.006
Joseph, R., Lim, J.M.H., & Nor Arifah, M. (2014). Communicative moves in forestry research introductions: Implications for the design of learning materials. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 53–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.224
Juan, Z., & Tao, W. (2013). A genre analysis of medical abstracts by Chinese and English native speakers. Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA, 28, 60–64.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2013). Generic characterisation of civil engineering research article abstracts. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(3), 1–10.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400831296-024
Le, T., & Harrington, M. (2015). Phraseology used to comment on results in the discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 45–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.003
Lim, J.M.H. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.001
Lim, J.M.H. (2010). Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 28, 280–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.10.001
Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2018). The schematic structure of discussion sections in applied linguistics and the distribution of metadiscourse markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34, 97–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.04.002
Loi, C., Sweetnam Evans, M., Akkakoson, S., Ahmed, S., & Ahmed, S. (2015). Rhetorical patterns in the discussion sections of Malay research articles. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(2), 118–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJLLL.2015.V1.23
MacDonald, S. (1994). Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. Southern Illinois University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/358308
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003188414
Martin, J.R. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.). Children writing: Reader (pp. 21–29). Deakin University Press.
Meidan, A. (1984). The marketing of Tourism. Service Industries Journal, 4, 166–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02642068400000069
Miller, C.R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686
Moreno, A.I. (2022). To be, or not to be, self-critical? Writing discussion and/or closing sections in English and Spanish social science research articles. ESP Today, 10(2), 221–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.2.2
Moyetta, D. (2016). The discussion section of English and Spanish research articles in psychology: A contrastive study. ESP Today, 4(1), 87–106.
Nwogu, K.N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 25–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7
Perry, L.F. Jr. (2005). Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315394664
Pojanapunya, P., & Todd, W. R. (2011). Relevance of findings in results to discussion sections in applied linguistics research. Proceedings of the International Conference: Doing Research in Applied Linguistics. King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi and Macquarie University.
Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00001-5
Rudestam, K.E., & Newton, R.R. (2001). Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Salmani Nodoushan, M., & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses "Discussion" Sections: A Structural Move Analysis. International Journal of Language Studies, 5(3), 111–132.
Shapin, S. (2022). Hard science, soft science: A political history of a disciplinary array. History of Science, 60, 287–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00732753221094739
Sinclair, G., & Webber, B.L. (2004). Classification from full text: A comparison of canonical sections of scientific papers. NLPBA/BioNLP, 66–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1567594.1567608
Swales, J.M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. The Language Studies Unit, University of Aston.
Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. The University of Michigan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/358319
Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed.). The University of Michigan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/358319
Thanajirawat, Z., Chuea-nongthon, C. (2022). Move and text analysis of the discussion section in humanities and social sciences research articles. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 217–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911531
Weissberg, R., & Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research: Experimental research report writing for students of English. Prentice Hall Regents.
Yang, R. (2001). A genre analysis of research articles in applied linguistics [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365–385.
