Investigating Coaching Leadership Among Departmental Heads in Sabah, Malaysia: An Empirical Study on Lecturers’ Perceptions
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine lecturers’ perceptions of coaching leadership among department heads in Sabah, Malaysia. The sample comprised 56 lecturers from three private colleges in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, who responded to a structured questionnaire on Google Forms. Data were analyzed by using SPSS 29.0. Results showed that a low number of lecturers tend to perceive their department heads as coaching leaders (only 48.2 to 60.7 percent). On the other hand, nonparametric tests showed that there were no significant differences by way of gender, age, and job experience in perceived coaching leadership. Additionally, Wilcoxon signed rank test based on a hypothesized value of 3.5 showed that all coaching leadership items were significant at p < 0.001, having medians that were significantly different from the test value, and were likely to indicate strong disagreement. Lastly, in light of the findings, several recommendations were made for department heads to incorporate coaching leadership as part of their management to increase organizational productivity, job motivation, and organizational commitment amongst staff.
Downloads
References
Boogaard, K. (2023, July 21). Use the coaching leadership style to help your team achieve its full potential. Atlassian. https://www.atlassian.com/blog/leadership/coaching-leadership-style
Bush, T. & Ng, A. Y. M. (2019). Distributed leadership and the Malaysia education blueprint: From prescription to partial school-based enactment in a highly centralised context. Journal of Educational Administration (JEA), 57(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2018-0206
Chong, L. P., & Yong, F. L. (2024). Influence of authoritarian, instructional, and transactional leadership styles on teachers’ job satisfaction in Sabah, Malaysia. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 11(5), 46-56. www.noveltyjournals.com
DeLuca, C. L. (2016, September 23). Coaching as a leadership style. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/coaching-leadership-style-christina-deluca/
Dai, Y. (2019). Coaching leadership, job motivation and employee innovation behavior. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 376, 696-701. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Dennison, K. (2021, September 20). Why leaders should consider shifting to a coaching leadership style now more than ever. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/karadennison/2021/09/20/why-leaders-should-consider-shifting-to-a-coaching-leadership-style-now-more-than-ever/
Dong, X. (2021). Research on the influence of coaching leadership on employees' work performance. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 3(11), 92-98. 10.25236/AJBM.2021.031118
Giersdorf, S., & Croissant, A. (2011). Civil society and competitive authoritarianism in Malaysia. Journal of Civil Society, 7(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2011.553401
Huang, S. (2019). The impact of coaching leadership on in-role performance of employees: Based on the perspective of social information processing theory. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(12). 10.4236/jss.2019.712017
Hwang, C. Y., Kang, S-W., & Choi, S. B. (2023). Coaching leadership and creative performance: A serial mediation model of psychological empowerment and constructive voice behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1077594. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077594
John Mattone Global. (2025, February 25). The coaching leadership style: A transformational approach to leadership. https://johnmattone.com/blog/the-coaching-leadership-style-a-transformational-approach-to-leadership/
Kim, M. J., & Park, J. W. (2022). A study on the effect of supervisor's coaching leadership on positive psychological capital and organizational commitment of organizational members. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 50(1), 91-104. https://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.1.91
Majola, N. M., Setlalentoa, W., & Thabane, R. W. (2024). Implementation of coaching leadership style by principals to enhance learner success. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (EHASS), 5(13), 2141-2151. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.202451311
Mäkelä, L., Kangas, H., Korkiakangas, E., & Laitinen, J. (2023). Coaching leadership as a link between individual- and team-level strength use at work. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2293469
Numly - Leadership Coaching Group. (2022, June 23). Develop your coaching leadership at work. Numly. https://numly.io/blog/what-is-coaching-leadership-when-to-use-it-for-success/
Pannell, R. (2023, April 5). The importance of identifying the right sample size for business improvement. Leanscape. https://leanscape.io/the-importance-of-identifying-the-right-sample-size-for-business-improvement/
Park, J., & Wee, W. (2020). A study on the relationship among coaching leadership, job autonomy and job commitment. Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research, 5(1), 37-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.21742/ajemr.2020.5.1.04
Parlar, H., Türkoglu, M. E., & Cansoy, R. (2022). Exploring how authoritarian leadership affects commitment: The mediating roles of trust in the school principal and silence. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(1),110-129. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1322891
Ren, L., Yin, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhu, D. (2024). Does coaching leadership facilitate employees' taking charge? A perspective of conservation of resources theory. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 39(6), 749-774. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2022-0623
Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. https://www.amazon.com/Fundamental-Statistics Behavioral-International-processes/dp/0030919347
RUBIKTOP. (2023, September 14). The magic number 30: Why a sample size of 30 is often considered sufficient for statistical significance. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/magic-number-30-why-sample-size-often-considered-sufficient/
Sirat, M., Ahmad, A., & Azman, N. (2012). University leadership in crisis: The need for effective leadership positioning in Malaysia. Higher Education Policy, 25, 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.10
Stanier, M. B. (2023, December 22). Coaching leadership style: Amplify your influence with curiosity. MBS Works. https://www.mbs.works/coaching-leadership-style/
Tang, L., Shi, M., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., & Yang, B. (2024). Building a committed workforce: The synergistic effects of coaching leadership, organizational self-esteem, and learning goal orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1423540
Wang, J., Gu, Y., Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Liao, L. (2022). The mechanism of the influence of coaching leadership behavior on subordinate’s sense of gain at work. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(4), 638-652. 10.1108/LODJ-07-2021-0342
Wee, K., Bang, K., & Park, J. (2020). A study on effect relationships of coaching leadership job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention. International Journal of Social Welfare Promotion and Management,7(1), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.21742/ijswpm.2020.7.1.01
Yuan, C., Wang, Y., Huang, W., & Zhu, Y. (2019). Can coaching leadership encourage subordinates to speak up? Dual perspective of cognition-affection. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(4), 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2018-0009















