A Semiotic Framework for Traditional Textile Patterns: Extending Morris's Theory to Visual Cultural Heritage
Abstract
Traditional textile patterns, as significant carriers of visual cultural heritage, embody profound cultural connotations, yet existing research lacks a unified theoretical framework. Based on the classical semiotic tripartite model, this study constructs an extended semiotic framework specifically applicable to traditional textile pattern analysis through interdisciplinary theoretical integration, encompassing three dimensions: visual syntactics, cultural semantics, and social pragmatics. Visual syntactics analyzes pattern elements, color systems, spatial composition, and craft techniques; cultural semantics explores historical background, meaning evolution, regional features, and value representation; social pragmatics examines usage contexts, group differences, social influences, and contemporary practice. This research employs Chinese traditional dragon-phoenix patterns as a case study, conducting in-depth analysis of representative works from three periods (the Warring States, Qing Dynasty, and contemporary era) to validate the effectiveness of the extended framework. Results demonstrate that the framework can systematically reveal the multiple attributes and complex values of traditional textile patterns, overcoming the limitations of traditional single analytical methods and achieving unified analysis of form, content, and function. This study provides new directions for the development of semiotic theory toward multimodal visual symbolic systems and offers systematic methodological tools for visual cultural heritage research and traditional cultural transmission practice.
Downloads
References
Andrew, S. (2008). Textile semantics: Considering a communication-based reading of textiles. Textile, 6(1), 32-65. https://doi.org/10.2752/175183508X288680
Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text. Hill and Wang.
Bateman, J., Wildfeuer, J., & Hiippala, T. (2017). Multimodality: Foundations, research and analysis–A problem-oriented introduction. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110479898
Bateman, J. A. (2017). Triangulating transmediality: A multimodal semiotic framework relating media, modes and genres. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 160-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.009
Bateman, J. A., & Wildfeuer, J. (2014). A multimodal discourse theory of visual narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 180-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.001
Bezemer, J., & Jewitt, C. (2022). Social semiotics. In J. Östman, J. Verschueren, & C. B. Paul (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 1255–1263). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.soc5
Bourdieu, P. (2018). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. In D. B. Grusky & J. Hill (Eds.), Inequality (pp. 287–318). Routledge.
Clunas, C. (1997). Art in China. Oxford University Press, USA.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
Elkins, J. (2013). Visual studies: A skeptical introduction. Routledge.
Hall, S., Evans, J., & Nixon, S. (2024). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Harris, J. (1993). 5000 years of textiles. British Museum Press London.
Key, L., & Noble, B. P. (2017). An analysis of Ferdinand de Saussure's Course in general linguistics (1st ed.). Macat Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912281732
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857
Lu, X. (2012). Cultural connotation and artistic presentation in symbols of dragons and phoenixes. Journal of Nantong University(Social Sciences Edition), 28(01), 82-87. [In Chinese]
Ma, Z. (2008). History of the dragon and phoenix pattern. Journal of Chengdu Textile College, (1), 76–78. [In Chinese]
Mirzoeff, N. (1999). An introduction to visual culture (Vol. 274). Routledge London.
Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1934). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Rawson, J. (1984). Chinese ornament: The lotus and the dragon. London: British Museum Publications.
Rose, G. (2022). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Saussure, F. d. (1983). Course in General Linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.; C. B. A. Sechehaye, Ed.). La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.
Schoeser, M. (2022). World textiles. Thames & Hudson.
Shan, J. (2020). Enhancing cultural identity through high-quality cultural products: Insights from the development of Palace Museum cultural creativity. Han Yangling Museum. http://www.hylae.com/index.php?ac=article&at=read&did=1950 (accessed July 12, 2025)
Swedberg, R. (2014). The art of social theory. Princeton University Press.
Turner, V. W. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual (Vol. 101). Cornell University Press.
Weiner, A. B., & Schneider, J. (2013). Cloth and human experience. Smithsonian Institution. DOI: 10.1126/science.249.4976.1588
Welch, P. B. (2013). Chinese art: A guide to motifs and visual imagery. Tuttle Publishing.
Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature (Vol. 392). Oxford Paperbacks.
Wilson, K. (2021). A history of textiles. Routledge.
Wong, W. (1993). Principles of form and design. John Wiley & Sons.
Yan, Y. (2023). The imperial court costume system and its cultural connotations in the Qing dynasty: The fourth lecture of the fifth series of “Scholars discuss the Forbidden City”. The Palace Museum. https://www.dpm.org.cn/classify_detail/262014.html (accessed July 12, 2025)
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zhao, F., Luo, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2012). Study on the brocade with double-dragon and double-phoenix designs of the Warring States. Cultural Relics, (7), 51-58. [In Chinese]
