Perceptions of China Among Educated Malaysian Chinese Youth: A Quantitative Assessment of Country Image

  • Jenn Yuan Lee Tun Tan Cheng Lock Institute of Social Studies, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Sungai Long, Bandar Sungai Long, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Chin Yee Mun Tun Tan Cheng Lock Institute of Social Studies, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Sungai Long, Bandar Sungai Long, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Tan Sing Pei Tun Tan Cheng Lock Institute of Social Studies, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Sungai Long, Bandar Sungai Long, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Keywords: China, Country image, Malaysian Chinese youth, Diaspora, Soft power, Perception, Normative legitimacy

Abstract

This study examines perceptions of China’s country image among educated Malaysian Chinese youth, a diaspora group significant for China’s soft power in Southeast Asia. Using a 2024 survey, the analysis applies a multidimensional framework—functional, aesthetic, and normative. Results show a moderately positive overall evaluation (3.67/5), but with sharp contrasts. Aesthetic perceptions of Chinese culture, cuisine, and heritage score highest (3.94), reflecting strong cultural affinity. Functional views of economic growth, infrastructure, and technology are positive yet more ambivalent (3.70). Normative evaluations are lowest (3.34), with civic rights (3.13), international responsibility (3.42), and environmental protection (3.45) identified as weaknesses. These findings illustrate the layered nature of diaspora perceptions: admiration of culture and development coexists with skepticism toward governance and global responsibility. The study argues that soft power rooted in aesthetics and development cannot replace normative legitimacy, and China’s challenge lies in integrating its cultural and functional strengths with greater normative credibility. For Malaysia, diaspora youth can mediate bilateral ties, but their critical views must be acknowledged. Theoretically, the research shows the value of disaggregated frameworks; practically, it urges China to broaden diaspora engagement beyond cultural diplomacy and Malaysia to leverage youth voices in regional diplomacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anholt, S. (2002). Nation-branding: A continuing theme. Journal of Brand Management, 10(1), 59-60.

Brady, A.-M. (2010). Marketing Dictatorship: Propaganda and Thought Work in Contemporary China. China Perspectives, 2010(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.5089

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Buhmann, A. (2016). Measuring Country Image. Theory, Method, and Effects. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Callahan, W. A. (2015). Identity and security in China: The negative soft power of the China dream. Politics, 35(3-4), 216-229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12088

Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human Nature and Social Order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

d'Hooghe, I. (2015). China's public diplomacy. Boston: BRILL.

Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. (2022). The state of Southeast Asia: 2022 survey report. Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute. Retrieved from https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/The-State-of-SEA-2022_FA_Digital_FINAL.pdf

Jenes, A. & Malota, E. (2009). Measuring Country Image - Theory and Practice. 8th International Marketing Trends Congress,. Paris. Retrieved from https://archives.marketing-trends-congress.com/2009/Materiali/Paper/Fr/Jenes_Malota.pdf

Kurlantzick, J. (2007). Charm offensive: How China's soft power is transforming the world. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Martin, I. M. & Erogul, S. (1993). Measuring a multi-dimensional construct: Country Image. Journal of Business Research, 28(3), 191-210.

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Meltzer, J. P. (2022, October). China’s digital services trade and data governance: How should the United States respond? Retrieved from Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-digital-services-trade-and-data-governance-how-should-the-united-states-respond/

Nes, W. J. (1982). Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies, 13, 89-100.

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: PublicAffairs.

Nye, J. S. (2015). Is the American Century Over? Political Science Quarterly, 130(3), 393-400.

Shambaug, D. (2015). China' soft power push: The Search for respect. Foreign Affairs, 94(4), 99-107. Retrieved from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://china.usc.edu/sites/default/files/forum/Shambaugh%20China%E2%80%99s%20Soft-Power%20Push%202015%20Foreign%20Affairs.pdf

Tan, C.-b. (2004). Chinese oversea: Comparative cultural issues. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yeoh, E. K.-K. (2019). Malaysia: Perception of Contemporary China and Its Economic, Political and Societal Determinants. The Pacific Review, 32(3), 395-418.

Zhao, X. Y. (2022). China's country image in the eyes of international students from Central Asian countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.569789

Published
2025-08-31
Section
Articles