Aplikasi Model UTAUT dalam Penggunaan Dron di KADA: Menilai Peranan Saiz Ladang Sebagai Pembolehubah Penyederhana
Abstract
Kajian ini mengkaji pemacu kontinjen niat tingkah laku untuk menerima pakai teknologi dron dalam kalangan petani padi di Lembaga Kemajuan Pertanian Kemubu (KADA), Malaysia. Berasaskan Teori Bersepadu Penerimaan dan Penggunaan Teknologi (UTAUT), ia mengkaji kesan langsung Jangkaan Prestasi, Jangkaan Usaha, dan Pengaruh Sosial, sambil memperkenalkan saiz ladang sebagai pembolehubah moderasi kritikal. Menggunakan tinjauan kuantitatif keratan rentas ke atas 200 petani, data dianalisis melalui Pemodelan Persamaan Struktur Kuasa Dua Terkecil Separa (PLS-SEM). Model ini menjelaskan 79.4% daripada varians dalam niat tingkah laku. Keputusan mengesahkan Pengaruh Sosial sebagai pemacu terkuat, diikuti oleh Jangkaan Usaha dan Jangkaan Prestasi. Selain itu, kajian turut mendapati saiz ladang telah menyederhanakan hubungan Jangkaan Prestasi dengan Niat Tingkah Laku dengan ketara, mendedahkan dua laluan yang berbeza iaitu laluan ekonomi-rasional untuk petani yang lebih besar dan laluan pematuhan sosial untuk pekebun kecil, di mana kepercayaan prestasi tidak signifikan. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahawa mempromosikan teknologi dron memerlukan pendekatan bersegmen di bawah Dasar Agromakanan Negara 2.0 (DAN 2.0) Malaysia, yang mengutamakan bukti sosial dan kemudahan penggunaan untuk majoriti pekebun kecil berbanding peranan ekonomi generik.
Downloads
References
Abd. Jalil, N. Z., Berahim, Z., Zakaria, N., Omar, M. H., Rosle, R., Ismail, M. R., Che´ya, N. N., Abd. Latiff, A., Ilahi, W. F. F., & Gandjaeva, L. (2024). Rice response to spermine foliar application and its association with aerial imagery monitoring under water stress conditions. Sains Malaysiana, 53(7), 1575–1587. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2024-5307-08
Assavakul, S., & Savithi, C. (2024). Factors influencing the adoption of small unmanned aerial vehicles (Drone) in large-scale agriculture: A case study of large-scale rice field agriculture in Maha Sarakham Province. (Master thesis, Mahasarakham University). http://202.28.34.124/dspace/handle/123456789/3012
Azizul, A. S., Pebrian, D., Mustaffha, S., Shamsi, S. M., Zahari, M. K., & Ruslan, N. A. (2023). The use of drone for rice cultivation in Malaysia: Identification of factors influencing its farmers' acceptance. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 22(7), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2023.04.005
Bilaliib Udimal, T., Jincai, Z., Mensah, O. S., & Caesar, A. E. (2017). Factors influencing the agricultural technology adoption: The case of improved rice varieties (Nerica) in the Northern Region, Ghana. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 8(8), 1–10.
Chakreeves, T., Preittigun, A., & Phu-ang, A. (2021). Stakeholder analysis of agricultural drone policy: A case study of the agricultural drone ecosystem of Thailand. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Law and Political Sciences, 15(1), 82–89.
De Padua, E. P., Amongo, R. C., Quilloy, E. P., Suministrado, D. C., & Elauria, J. C. (2021). Development of a local unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) pesticide sprayer for rice production system in the Philippines. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science & Engineering, 1109, 012022. DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/1109/1/012022
Degieter, M., de Steur, H., Tran, D., Gellynck, X., & Schouteten, J. J. (2023). Farmers' acceptance of robotics and unmanned aerial vehicles: A systematic review. Agronomy Journal, 115(5), 2159–2173. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21427
Dutta, G., & Goswami, P. (2020). Application of drone in agriculture: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8(5), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5d.10529
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2023). The state of food and agriculture 2023. Revealing the true cost of food to transform agrifood systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://doi.org/10.4060/cc7724en
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Harun, R., Engku Ariff, E. E., Suhaimee, S., & Wan Mat, K. (2024). Farmers' perception towards the effective use of drones in selected rice farming areas in Malaysia. International Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Plantation, 14, 53–58.
Kementerian Pertanian dan Keterjaminan Makanan. (2021). Dasar Agromakanan Negara 2021-2030 (DAN 2.0): Pemodenan agromakanan, menjamin masa depan sekuriti makanan negara. Putrajaya.
Le, V. T., & Tran, H. G. (2024). Scaling up: The impact of cooperative models on technology maintenance and repair in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2024.2329912
Lembaga Kemajuan Pertanian Kemubu (KADA). (2020). Buku rumusan perangkaan 2020. http://www.kada.gov.my/maklumat-asas-kada/
Man, N., Ramli, N. N., & Che’ya, N. N. (2024). Farmers’ intention towards drone adoption in granary areas of KADA, IADA Kemasin Semerak, Kelantan and IADA KETARA, Terengganu, Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1412(1), 012019. DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1412/1/012019
Mikhaylov, D., Song, J. J., & Mitrokhin, M. (2023). Unleashing the potential of UAVs in agriculture: ASEAN and Thailand's rice production industry improvements: Review article. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 19(5), 2145-2160.
Montesclaros, J. M. L., & Teng, P. S. (2023). Digital technology adoption and potential in Southeast Asian agriculture. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 20(2), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.37801/ajad2023.20.2.1
Panjaitan, S. D., Dewi, Y. S. K., Hendri, M. I., Wicaksono, R. A., & Priyatman, H. (2022). A drone technology implementation approach to conventional paddy fields application. IEEE Access, 10, 120650–120658. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3221188
Puppala, H., Peddinti, P. R. T., Tamvada, J. P., Ahuja, J., & Kim, B. (2023). Barriers to the adoption of new technologies in rural areas: The case of unmanned aerial vehicles for precision agriculture in India. Technology in Society, 74, 102335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102335
Ravindran, Y., Haris, N. B. M., Shah, J. A., & Ilahi, W. F. F. (2024). UTAUT model insights on the adoption of smart farming technologies (SFTs) in Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 8(8), 4011–4020. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8080301
Ruzzante, S., Labarta, R., & Bilton, A. (2021). Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. World Development, 146, 105599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105599
Salleh, M. N., Osman, W. N., Zulhumadi, F., Iteng, R., & Bakar, S. (2024). Readiness and acceptance towards drone technology in Malaysian agriculture: A case study in Muda Agricultural Development Authority (MADA). AIP Conference Proceedings, 2799(1), 020081. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182261
Secretariat ASEAN. (2023). ASEAN annual report 2022-2023: ASEAN matters: Epicentrum of growth. ASEAN Secretariat.
Sinar Harian. (2023, Ogos 15). Teknologi dron semakin diterima pesawah. Sinar Harian. https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/245175/edisi/utara/teknologi-dron-semakin-diterima-pesawah
Sutrisno, B., & Handayani, T. (2025). Bridging the digital divide in archipelagic agriculture: Case studies in service-based adoption models in Indonesia and the Philippines. Asian Journal of Digital Agriculture, 4(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44265-024-00012-7
Tanaka, K., & Nguyen, M. T. (2024). Intergenerational adoption gap: Digital literacy training and its effect on older farmers' use of precision technology in Thailand. Global Agricultural Technology Review, 12(3), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.3389/gatr.2024.112345
Tran, T. A., James, H., & Pittock, J. (2022). Social learning through rural communities of practice: Evidence from Vietnamese farming households. Agricultural Systems, 190, 103091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103091
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wee, G. W. E., & Lim, A. S. S. (2022). Factors influencing the behavioural intention for smart farming in Sarawak, Malaysia. Journal of Agribusiness Marketing, 9, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.56527/jabm.9.1.4
World Bank. (2022). Harvesting prosperity: Technology and productivity growth in agriculture. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1597-1
Yang, Y., Tilman, D., Jin, Z., Smith, P., Barrett, C. B., Zhu, Y.-G., Burney, J., D'Odorico, P., Fantke, P., Fargione, J., Finlay, J. C., Rulli, M. C., Sloat, L., van Groenigen, K. J., West, P. C., Ziska, L., Michalak, A. M., & the Clim-Ag Team. (2024). Climate change exacerbates the environmental impacts of agriculture. Science, 385(6713), eadn3747. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn3747
Zaman, N. B. K., Raof, W. N. A. A., Saili, A. R., Aziz, N. N., Fatah, F. A., & Vaiappuri, S. K. N. (2023). Adoption of smart farming technology among rice farmers. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 29(2), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.29.2.268275















