Determinants of Digital Museum Visit Intention: An Integrated TAM–TPB Model

  • Qingyi Deng Guangzhou Huali College, 511325, Guangzhou, China
  • Khayril Anwar Khairudin Faculty of Art & Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
Keywords: Digital museum, Mobile internet, Cloud computing, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the digital transformation of cultural heritage institutions, mobile Internet and cloud computing technologies have gradually made digital museums an important alternative to physical visits. To deeply explore the underlying behavioral motivations of tourists choosing mobile digital museums, this study integrates the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), taking the Palace Museum in Beijing as a specific context, and constructs a contextualized direct effect model that includes four core antecedent variables: convenience, technological familiarity, social influence, and cost. Based on the verified 552 research data, we conducted an empirical test of the conceptual path using the structural equation model. The key findings indicate: (1) Social influence is the most crucial factor driving tourists’ visit intention (β= 0.327), highlighting the core role of group identification and social sharing in cultural consumption; (2) Cost (β= 0.263), technology familiarity (β= 0.260), and convenience (β= 0.259) also have a significant positive impact on the visit intention. This research helps to alleviate the limitations of a single theoretical framework when explaining complex cultural consumption decisions, and provides valuable management insights for large cultural heritage institutions to optimize their cloud computing architectures and mobile platform designs, and enhance cultural accessibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation–confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Lee, H., Jung, T. H., tom Dieck, M. C., & Chung, N. (2020). Experiencing immersive virtual reality in museums. Information & Management, 57(5), Article 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103229

Li, Z., Shu, S., Shao, J., Booth, E., & Morrison, A. M. (2021). Innovative or not? The effects of consumer perceived value on purchase intentions for the Palace Museum’s cultural and creative products. Sustainability, 13(5), 2412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052412

Loureiro, S. M. C., Guerreiro, J., & Ali, F. (2020). 20 years of research on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism context: A text-mining approach. Tourism Management, 77, Article 104028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104028

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Shi, M., Wang, Q., & Long, Y. (2023). Exploring the key drivers of user continuance intention to use digital museums: Evidence from China’s Sanxingdui Museum. IEEE Access, 11, 81511–81526. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3297501

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144

Published
2026-05-31
Section
Articles