Bridging Property Right Theory, Corrective Justice Theory and Institutional Theory to Enhance Land Registration System
Abstract
The digitalization of land registration aims at modernising and enhancing the performance of government services with a comprehensive, user friendly, secure and trustworthy system. However, section 340 of the National Land Code remains to pose an unjust fortune for an innocent land owner in a matter of land dispute with an innocent subsequent purchaser with valuable consideration. A depth analysis of property right theory, corrective justice theory and institutional theory will be conducted to lay down the justification and rational of improvement needed to address the abovementioned issue: this becomes the sole objective of this research. From the doctrinal method employed throughout this study, the result demonstrated that the combination of these three theories allows for positive enhancement of the land registration system. Integrating property right theory and corrective justice theory set the foundation to ameliorate the aspect of compensation and enforcement mechanism while the institutional theory necessitates upgrading the overall governance of the land registration system by strengthening the reliability of the database as well as refining the verification protocols of land registration. This paper argues that the absence of a compensation mechanism and weak institutional safeguards undermine the Torrens system. To improve title security and restore confidence in the land registration system, it proposes an integrated theoretical framework.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, N. C., Ramly, R. & Ikhsan, M. I. (2017). Land Registration of Titles at Stake: West and East Malaysia Compared. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2 (6),197-203. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v2i6.988
Abu Bakar, N., (2016). Security of Tenure in the Malaysian Computerized Land Registration: A Myth. The Social Sciences 11 (Special Issue 6), 7310-7313. https://makhillpublications.co/files/published-files/mak-tss/2016/30-7310-7313.pdf
Azizun, N., Dian, A., & Arshad, A. (2024). Land Assurance Fund Frameworks: An Analytical Study of Relevant Legal Provisions in Malaysia and Australia. International Journal of Research, 8, 1562-1574. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100136
Bell, A., & Parchomovsky, G. (2004). A theory of property. Cornell L. Rev., 90, 531. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2989&context=clr
Bentham, J. (1891). Theory of Legislation. (7th ed.). Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. 111. https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Lbb05L0NYkUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Theory+of+Legislation&ots=G5U5gxs8x2&sig=nr2-31ARkak0MrrEOfU66zyFrPo&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Theory%20of%20Legislation&f=false
Birdal, M. (2007). Locke’s theory of property and its Marxist critique: A comparison between Locke and Marx on property right and individual liberties. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 57(1).
Burns, R. P. (1985). Blackstone's Theory of the Absolute Rights of Property. U. Cin. L. Rev., 54, 67.
Bronsther, J. (2021). The corrective justice theory of punishment. Virginia Law Review, 107(2), 227-279.
Choon, T. L., Zulkifli, N. A., Ujang, M. U., & Chin, T. A. (2015). Malaysian land administration domain model country profile. Asian Social Science, 11(24), 301. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n24p301
Halid, S. N., & Hassim, J. Z. (2024). Exploring legal tenure security in Malaysia: does formal titling ensures rights to land owners?. Cogent social sciences, 10(1), 2433793. 10.1080/23311886.2024.2433793
Hanna, B., Xu, G., Wang, X., & Hossain, J. (2023). Blockchain-enabled humanitarian supply chain management: sustainability and responsibility. Blockchain in a volatile-uncertain-complex-ambiguous world (pp. 251-276). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89963-5.00001-0
Maidin, A. J., & Khadouf, H. A. (2009). Weaknesses in the Registration of Land Dealing Ssytem in Malaysis: Suggestion for improvement for enhancing the system. Law Review, 4.; [2010] 1 LNS (A) I. https://www.scribd.com/document/68480577/Weaknesses-in-the-Registration-of-Land-Dealings-System-in-Malaysia
Magnano, D. G., Grimstad, S. M. F., Glavee-Geo, R., & Anwar, F. (2024). Disentangling circular economy practices and firm's sustainability performance: a systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Journal of Environmental Management, 353, 120138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120138
Mohd, K. W., & Kader, S. Z. S. A. (2022). Responding to Land Fraud: Should torrens compensation scheme be introduced in Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI11), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI11.4171
Parchomovsky, G. (1997). Fair Use, Efficiency, and Corrective Justice. Legal Theory, 3(4), 347-378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000847
Swaraj, A. (2019). Exploratory research: Purpose and process. Parisheelan Journal, 15(2), 665-670.
Torrens, Robert R., (1859), The South Australian System of Conveyancing by Registration of Title with Instruction for the Guidance of Parties’ Dealings. e-book, <http://arisp.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/thesouthaustraliansystemofconveyanc.pdf> accessed 3 December 2021.
Zakaria, S. R. A., & Hussin, K. (2012). Assurance fund as a new mechanism in protecting landowners in Malaysia. 3rd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (3rd ICBER 2012) Proceeding, 1616–1626.
Zakariah, Y., Samsudin, S., & Ngadiman, N. (2020). An overview of the fraud and forgery challenges in land registration system. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(03), 274-282.
