Analisis Kesediaan dan Kesesuaian Pembelajaran Morfologi Arab Secara Dalam Talian: Pengalaman Pelajar USIM dan Implikasi Pasca-Pandemik
Abstract
Kajian ini meneliti kesediaan pelajar serta kesesuaian pembelajaran kursus teras Morfologi Arab secara dalam talian berdasarkan pengalaman pembelajaran pelajar semasa pandemik COVID-19, kemudian mentafsir semula dapatan tersebut dalam konteks pendidikan tinggi Malaysia pada masa kini. Data soal selidik yang mengandungi 88 respons pelajar tahun tiga program Sarjana Muda Bahasa Arab dan Komunikasi, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. Instrumen merangkumi demografi, kesediaan teknologi, pengalaman pembelajaran berdasarkan skala Likert berkaitan keberkesanan, pemahaman, kelangsungan dan sokongan infrastruktur. Analisis deskriptif yang melibatkan data kekerapan, peratusan, min, sisihan piawai dan lain-lain membantu menjelaskan rumusan kajian yang dibuat. Dapatan menunjukkan bahawa semua responden mempunyai peranti yang sesuai di mana 93.2% melaporkan kemahiran ICT dan 89.8% mempunyai capaian internet yang baik. Namun, 80.7% berpandangan pembelajaran dalam talian hanya sesuai dalam situasi mendesak dan 55.7% tidak bersetuju bahawa subjek bahasa sesuai diajar secara dalam talian. Iaa juga menunjukkan bahawa penilaian keberkesanan pembelajaran Morfologi Arab secara dalam talian adalah sederhana (M = 2.88, SP = 0.87), sementara keperluan persediaan tambahan adalah tinggi (M = 4.17, SP = 0.76). Kesimpulannya, dapatan menunjukkan bahawa kesediaan teknologi tidak boleh disamakan dengan kesesuaian pedagogi. Sebaliknya, data pandemik ini lebih tepat dibaca sebagai bukti sejarah tentang pengalaman emergency remote teaching (ERT) dan tidak boleh membuktikan reka bentuk pembelajaran yang perlu diteruskan dalam keadaan biasa. Kajian mencadangkan model teradun yang mengekalkan latihan digital berulang dan akses sumber, sambil memberi ruang interaksi bersemuka bagi demonstrasi, pembetulan dan latihan morfologi yang intensif.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. F., et al. (2023). Readiness and challenges of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic era: A space analysis in Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20020905
Almaiah, M. A., et al. (2024). An empirical investigation of student online learning continuance intention in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 26(3), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-08-2023-0156
Alzahrani, L., & Seth, K. P. (2021). Factors influencing students’ satisfaction with continuous use of learning management systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6787–6805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10492-5
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., et al. (2022). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27, 531–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Finlay, M. J., Tinnion, D. J., & Simpson, T. (2023). Investigation into the transition to online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic, between new and continuing undergraduate students. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 32, 100430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100430
Galvis, Á. H., & Carvajal, D. (2022). Learning from success stories when using eLearning and bLearning modalities in higher education: A meta-analysis and lessons towards digital educational transformation. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00325-x
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning (3–21). Pfeiffer.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 27 March 2020.
Imran, R., Fatima, A., Salem, I. E., & Allil, K. (2023). Teaching and learning delivery modes in higher education: Looking back to move forward post-COVID-19 era. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100805
Karadag, E., Su, A., & Ergin-Kocaturk, H. (2021). Multi-level analyses of distance education capacity, faculty members’ adaptation, and indicators of student satisfaction in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00291-w
Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi. (2025). Dasar Pendigitalan Pendidikan Tinggi 2025–2030. Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi.
Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi. (2025). Pelan Tindakan Pendigitalan Pendidikan Tinggi 2025–2030. Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi.
Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi. (2026). Rancangan Pendidikan Tinggi Malaysia 2026–2035. Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi.
Khan, M. A., et al. (2024). Students’ perception of attending online learning sessions post-pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100755
Kumar, P., Saxena, C., & Baber, H. (2021). Learner-content interaction in e-learning: The moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of learners. Smart Learning Environments, 8, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00149-8
Martin, F., et al. (2022). Developing an online learner satisfaction framework in higher education through a systematic review of research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19.
Meinokat, P., & Wagner, I. (2022). Causes, prevention, and interventions regarding classroom disruptions in digital teaching: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 4657–4684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10795-7
Mohamad, N., et al. (2026). Blended learning: Readiness and learning styles of Quantity Surveying students in higher educational institution in Malaysia. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 16(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-02-2025-0043
Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
Regmi, K., & Jones, L. (2022). A systematic review of health sciences students’ online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education.
Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002
Zheng, M., Bender, D., & Lyon, C. (2021). Online learning during COVID-19 produced equivalent or better student course performance as compared with pre-pandemic: Empirical evidence from a school-wide comparative study. BMC Medical Education, 21, 495. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02909-z
