Feminism and a View of Conservative Gender Roles among Young Working Women in Malaysia
Abstract
People are often influenced by norms and ideologies, including the concepts of feminism and conservative gender roles. With perceptions evolving constantly, we intend to investigate the subject of feminism and the view of young working women in Malaysia with regards to conservative gender roles. Studies on the subject have been scarce or minimal so far, hence understanding the general population’s perception will allow us to better measure public awareness on the topic of our research. The demographic of participants in this study specifically encompasses working women, between the ages of eighteen and forty years old. The participants were recruited through virtual mediums, namely WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram. They were then asked to participate in a semi-structured interview to aid in the collection of detailed data which was then analysed through the process of transcription and coding for recurring themes. The study suggests that young working women in Malaysia are more in tune with feminism than originally anticipated due to digital platforms. Among the inequalities faced in the workforce, the most cited are equal and fair pay. Family upbringing, tradition and culture were often cited as shaping the general evolution of gender roles. Research can be done on feminism, gender roles and their implications on the LGBT community as a whole.
Downloads
References
Aston, M., Price, S., Kirk, S. F. L., & Penney, T. (2012). More than meets the eye. Feminist poststructuralism as a lens towards understanding obesity. Journal of advanced nursing, 68(5), 1187-1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05866.x
Ariffin, R. (1999). Feminism in Malaysia. Women's Studies International Forum, 22(4), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-5395(99)00039-4
Barrett, M. J. (2005). Making (some) sense of feminist poststructuralism in environmental education research and practice. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 10(1), 79-93.
Beasley, C. (1999). What is feminism?: an introduction to feminist theory. SAGE.
Beste, J. (2006). The limits of poststructuralism for feminist theology. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 5-19. https://doi.org/10.2979/FSR.2006.22.1.5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, A. M., & Ismail, K. J. (2019). Feminist Theorizing of Men and Masculinity: Applying Feminist Perspectives to Advance College Men and Masculinities Praxis. Online Submission, 42(1), 17-35.
Elder, N. C., & Miller, W. L. (1995). Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies. The Journal of Family Practice, 41(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349435.n4
Feminism. (2019). In Lexico Oxford Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/feminism
Garland-Thomson, R. (2002). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA journal, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1353/nwsa.2003.0005
Greaney, M. (2006). Feminism versus Post-structuralism. In Contemporary Fiction and the Uses of Theory (pp. 99-122). Palgrave Macmillan, L. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230208070_7
Gundersen, A. B., & Kunst, J. R. (2019). Feminist≠ feminine? Feminist women are visually masculinized whereas feminist men are feminized. Sex Roles, 80(5-6), 291-309.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0931-7
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/0022-4537.00234
Izharuddin, A. (2013). The use of English in contemporary Malaysian feminist activism. Editorial Board, 37.
Jurasz, O., & Barker, K. (2019). Online Misogyny: A Challenge for Digital Feminism?. Journal of International Affairs, In-Press.
Mann, S. A., & Patterson, A. S. (2016). Reading feminist theory: from modernity to postmodernity. Oxford University Press.
Mann, S. A. (2013). Third wave feminism's unhappy marriage of poststructuralism and intersectionality theory. Journal of feminist scholarship, 4(4), 54-73. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs/vol4/iss4/5
Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (2002). Theories and methods in political science. Palgrave.
Mitchell, J. (1974). Psychoanalysis and feminism, Freud, Reich, Laing and women. New York.
Niranjana, T. (2010). Why culture matters: rethinking the language of feminist politics. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 11(2), 229-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649371003616326
Qiu, Q. (2019). A Comparative Study of Novel Translation under Feminist Translation Theory: A Case Study of the Two Chinese Versions of To the Lighthouse. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(6), 718-722. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0906.16
Oxford. (2019). In Lexico Oxford Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/en/ definition/gender_role
Ramazanoglu, C. (1992). On Feminist Methodology: Male Reason Versus Female Empowerment. Sociology, 26(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038592026002003
Rickett, B. (2016). VI. Feminist psychology–poststructuralism, class and maternal subjectivities: Where are we and where should we go next?. Feminism & Psychology, 26(3), 320-326.https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353516641140
Seibold, C. (2000). Qualitative research from a feminist perspective in the postmodern era: Methodological, ethical and reflexive concerns. Nursing Inquiry, 7(3), 147-155. https:// doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1800.2000.00063.x
St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 13(5), 477-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156422
Yick, A. G. (2001). Feminist theory and status inconsistency theory: Application to domestic violence in chinese immigrant families. Violence Against Women, 7(5), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182596
Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2010). Minding the gap between feminist identity and attitudes: The behavioral and ideological divide between feminists and non-labelers. Journal of personality, 78(6), 1895-1924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14676494.2010.00673















