Students’ Perception Towards Teaching and Learning of Design and Technology Subject in English
Keywords:
English medium instruction (EMI), Perception, STEM Education
Abstract
This quantitative study aimed to explore the students' perception on the instruction medium of Design and Technology (Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi - RBT) subject in lower secondary forms. This study determined the perceptions of students based on factors such as Students’ preferred medium of instruction for RBT, Students’ readiness towards English medium instruction (EMI), and Developing English literacy through English medium instruction. This research utilized a survey research design. Online questionnaires constructed for data collection. The target population were 100 public school students in Form One, Two and Three. Findings from the questionnaire exhibits, the participants are favourable on the English medium instruction for RBT curriculum and believe they can benefit from learning RBT in English medium. The outcomes of the study are expected to influence curriculum designers, policymakers, educators and learners on the effectiveness of language in successful RBT pedagogy. In terms of local context, past studies on EMI focused mainly on Science and Mathematics; the traditional STEM subjects. Therefore, this research has the opportunity to fill the gap by including the latest subject, RBT.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abd Salam, N. H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Examining classroom interactions in secondary mathematics classrooms in Brunei Darussalam. Asian Social Science, 10(11), 92.
Abdullah, N., & Ali, A. (2017). Tahap Kesediaan Guru Pelatih Reka Bentuk Dan Teknologi Terhadap Pengajaran Mata Pelajaran Reka Cipta. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 2(1). Retrieved from https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/4763
Aguilar, M., & Rodriguez, R. (2012). Lecturer and student perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(2), 183-197.
Ali, M., & Ismail, Z. (2006). Comprehension level of non-technical terms in science: are we ready for science in English. Malaysian Journal of Educators and Education, 21, 73-83.
Al-Masheikhi, F., Al-Mahrooqi, R., & Denman, C. J. (2014). Investigating college of science student attitudes towards using English as a medium of instruction. In The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings (pp. 99-113).
Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and challenges of English language education reform in Malaysian primary schools. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature
Ball, P. and Lindsay, D., 2013. Language demands and support for English-medium instruction in tertiary education. Learning from a specific context. English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges, 4466.
Başıbek, N., Dolmacı, M., Cengiz, B. C., Bür, B., Dilek, Y., & Kara, B. (2014). Lecturers’ perceptions of English medium instruction at engineering departments of higher education: A study on partial English medium instruction at some state universities in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1819-1825.
Belhiah, H., & Elhami, M. (2015). English as a medium of instruction in the Gulf: When students and teachers speak. Language Policy, 14(1), 3-23.
Byun, K., Chu, H., Kim, M., Park, I., Kim, S., & Jung, J. (2011). English-medium teaching in Korean higher education: Policy debates and reality. Higher Education, 62(4), 431-449.
Coleman, J. A. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language teaching, 39(1), 1-14.
Costa, F., & Coleman, J. A. (2013). A survey of English-medium instruction in Italian higher education. International journal of bilingual education and bilingualism, 16(1), 3-19.
David, M. K., & Govindasamy, S. (2005). Negotiating a National Language Policy: Local Need for Affirmative action versus commitment towards globalization. Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 123-146.
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. The language learning journal, 42(2), 209-224.
Ellili-Cherif, M., & Alkhateeb, H. (2015). College students' attitude toward the medium of instruction: Arabic versus English dilemma.
Gill, S. K. (2005). Language policy in Malaysia: Reversing direction. Language policy, 4(3), 241-260.
Government of Malaysia (GoM) (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint: 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Economic Planning Unit.
Hamid, M. O., Jahan, I., & Islam, M. M. (2013). Medium of instruction policies and language practices, ideologies and institutional divides: Voices of teachers and students in a private university in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 144-163.
Hudson, P. (2009). Learning to teach science using English as the medium of instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 165-170.
Huei, O. K., Rus, R. C., & Kamis, A. (2019). Need Analysis: Competency Development Measurement Instrument in Mastering the Content of Design and Technology Subject in High School. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 1043-1052.
Isa, N. S., & Ma’arof, N. N. M. I. (2018). Keberkesanan penggunaan grafik berkomputer sebagai alat bahan bantu mengajar dalam kalangan pelajar reka bentuk dan teknologi. Sains Humanika, 10(3-3).
Isa, Z., Zakaria, A. M., Azlan, M. I., Noorani, M. S. M., Majid, N., Ismail, H., ... & Suradi, N. R. M. (2011). Students’ perceptions of the implementation of teaching and learning of Science and Mathematics in English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 361-366.
Ishak, T., & Mohamed, M. (2010). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran sains dan matematik dalam bahasa inggeris (PPSMI): Suatu isu berulang. Sains Humanika, 53(1).
Ismail, S. (2012). Kesediaan guru terhadap pelaksanaan mata pelajaran Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi (RBT) sekolah rendah di Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia).
Jalaluddin, N. H., & Syah, A. H. (2009). Penelitian makna imbuhan Pen-Dalam Bahasa Melayu: Satu kajian rangka rujuk silang. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 9(2).
Kaur, K. (2020, February 5). PPSMI: Why Malaysian Education System Keeps Switching Languages. TRP. https://www.therakyatpost.com/2020/02/04/kabhi-malay-kabhi-english-a-history-of-language-in-malaysias-education-system/
Kim, J., Tatar, B., & Choi, J. (2014). Emerging culture of English-medium instruction in Korea: experiences of Korean and international students. Language and Intercultural Communication, 14(4), 441-459.
Kiong, T. T., Saien, S., Yunos, J. M., Heong, Y. M., Mohamad, M. M., Azman, M. N. A., & Hanapi, Z. (2018). Teori PenyelesaianMasalah Inventif (TRIZ) Bagi Matapelajaran Reka Bentuk Dan Teknologi. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners.
Kocakulah, S., Ustunluoglu, E., & Kocakulah, A. (2005, December). The effect of teaching in native and foreign language on students' conceptual understanding in science courses. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching (Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-30). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2015) ‘Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tingkatan 1’.
Lan, O. S., & Tan, M. (2008). Mathematics And Science in English: Teachers Experience Inside the Classroom. Journal of Educators & Education/Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 23.
Le Ha, P., Kho, J., & Chng, B. (2013). Nation building, English as an international language, medium of instruction, and language debate: Malaysia and possible ways forward. Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 58-71.
Madya, D., Buntat, Y., Saud, M. S., & Ahmad, S. F. (2018). Masalah Pembelajaran Matematik Tahun Lima Dalam Bahasa Inggeris.
Majid, N., Jaaman, S. H., Darus, M., Nazar, R. M., Ramli, S. N. M., Suradi, N. R. M., ... & Ali, Z. M. (2011). The readiness of mathematics and science lecturers to teach in English from students’ perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 342-347.
Malaysia, K. P. (2015). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2015-2025 (Pendidikan Tinggi). Putrajaya, Malaysia: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Mendeng, J., & Abdol, M. J. (2004). Pelaksanaan Pengajaran Sains Dan Matematik Dalam bahasa Inggeris: Tinjauan Pada Persepsi Pelajar Di Tiga buah Sekolah Sekitar Daerah Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia).
Mohd Taha, N. (2014). Stres guru yang mengajar subjek Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi (RBT) di sekolah rendah di Kuantan (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia).
Moktar, S. N. A., Hanapi, Z., Kiong, T. T., Mohamed, S., & Rus, R. C. (2018). Kesediaan, Penerimaan Dan Pengoperasian Guru Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi Terhadap Amalan dalam Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah. Sains Humanika, 10(3-3).
Noble, J. P., Roberts, W. L., & Sawyer, R. L. (2006). Student Achievement, Behavior, Perceptions, and Other Factors Affecting ACT Scores. ACT Research Report Series, 2006-1. ACT, Inc.
Nor, F. M., Aziz, M. A., & Jusoff, K. (2011). Should English for teaching mathematics and science (ETeMS) in Malaysia be abolished. World applied sciences journal, 12(Special Issue on Creating a Knowledge Based society), 36-40.
Pandian, A., & Ramiah, R. (2004). Mathematics and science in English: Teacher voice. The English Teacher, 33(11), 2004-2050.
Phillipson, R. (2009). English in globalisation, a Lingua Franca or a Lingua Frankensteinia?. TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 335-339.
Pillay, H. (2003). Winds of change: Teaching Science and Mathematics in English–A perspective from the school. IPBA e-Journal, 1-5.
Racha, N. (2003). A survey on the readiness of students to learn Mathematics in English. Unpublished BA thesis, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia.
Rahmadani, D. (2016). Students’ perception of English as a medium of instruction (EMI) in English classroom. Journal on English as a foreign language, 6(2), 131-144.
Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2007). Theorizing student voice: Values and perspectives. Improving schools, 10(1), 5-17.
Rudduck, J. (2006). The past, the papers and the project. Educational Review, 58(2), 131-143.
Sahaat, Z., & Nasri, N. M. (2020). Cabaran Pelaksanaan Mata Pelajaran Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi Sekolah Menengah (Challenges in the Implementation of Design and Technology Subject in Secondary School). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia (Malaysian Journal of Education), 45(1SI), 51-59.
Suliman, A., Nor M. Y. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2017). Dual-language programme in Malaysian secondary schools: Glancing through the students’ readiness and unravelling the unheard voices. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 17(4).
Thang, S. M., & Olaybal, D. L. (2006). Creating And Testing a Science in English Website For Malaysian Secondary One Students. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 3(1), 36-42.
Usunier, J. C., & Roulin, N. (2010). The influence of high-and low-context communication styles on the design, content, and language of business-to-business web sites. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 47(2), 189-227.
Wachter, B., & Maiworm, F. (Eds.). (2014). English-taught programs in European higher education: The state of play in 2014. Lemmens Medien GmbH.
Wu, W. S. (2006). Students’ attitudes toward EMI: Using Chung Hua University as an example. Journal of Education and Foreign Language and Literature, 4, 67-84.
Xu, M. (1991). The impact of English-language proficiency on international graduate students' perceived academic difficulty. Research in Higher Education, 32(5), 557-570.
Yahaya, M. F. B., Noor, M. A. B. M., Mokhtar, A. A. B., Rawian, R. B. M., Othman, M. B., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Teaching of Mathematics and Science in English: The Teachers' Voices. English Language Teaching, 2(2), 141-147.
Yassin, S. M., Marsh, D., Tek, O. E., & Ying, L. Y. (2009). Learners’ perceptions towards the teaching of science through English in Malaysia: A quantitative analysis. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 54-69.
Yunus, M. M., & Sukri, S. I. A. (2017). The Use of English in Teaching Mathematics and Science: The PPSMI Policy vis-à-vis the DLP. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(1), 133-142.
Zubairi, A. M., & Sarudin, I. H. (2009). Motivation to learn a foreign language in Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 9(2).
Abdullah, N., & Ali, A. (2017). Tahap Kesediaan Guru Pelatih Reka Bentuk Dan Teknologi Terhadap Pengajaran Mata Pelajaran Reka Cipta. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 2(1). Retrieved from https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/4763
Aguilar, M., & Rodriguez, R. (2012). Lecturer and student perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(2), 183-197.
Ali, M., & Ismail, Z. (2006). Comprehension level of non-technical terms in science: are we ready for science in English. Malaysian Journal of Educators and Education, 21, 73-83.
Al-Masheikhi, F., Al-Mahrooqi, R., & Denman, C. J. (2014). Investigating college of science student attitudes towards using English as a medium of instruction. In The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings (pp. 99-113).
Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and challenges of English language education reform in Malaysian primary schools. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature
Ball, P. and Lindsay, D., 2013. Language demands and support for English-medium instruction in tertiary education. Learning from a specific context. English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges, 4466.
Başıbek, N., Dolmacı, M., Cengiz, B. C., Bür, B., Dilek, Y., & Kara, B. (2014). Lecturers’ perceptions of English medium instruction at engineering departments of higher education: A study on partial English medium instruction at some state universities in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1819-1825.
Belhiah, H., & Elhami, M. (2015). English as a medium of instruction in the Gulf: When students and teachers speak. Language Policy, 14(1), 3-23.
Byun, K., Chu, H., Kim, M., Park, I., Kim, S., & Jung, J. (2011). English-medium teaching in Korean higher education: Policy debates and reality. Higher Education, 62(4), 431-449.
Coleman, J. A. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language teaching, 39(1), 1-14.
Costa, F., & Coleman, J. A. (2013). A survey of English-medium instruction in Italian higher education. International journal of bilingual education and bilingualism, 16(1), 3-19.
David, M. K., & Govindasamy, S. (2005). Negotiating a National Language Policy: Local Need for Affirmative action versus commitment towards globalization. Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 123-146.
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. The language learning journal, 42(2), 209-224.
Ellili-Cherif, M., & Alkhateeb, H. (2015). College students' attitude toward the medium of instruction: Arabic versus English dilemma.
Gill, S. K. (2005). Language policy in Malaysia: Reversing direction. Language policy, 4(3), 241-260.
Government of Malaysia (GoM) (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint: 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Economic Planning Unit.
Hamid, M. O., Jahan, I., & Islam, M. M. (2013). Medium of instruction policies and language practices, ideologies and institutional divides: Voices of teachers and students in a private university in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 144-163.
Hudson, P. (2009). Learning to teach science using English as the medium of instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 165-170.
Huei, O. K., Rus, R. C., & Kamis, A. (2019). Need Analysis: Competency Development Measurement Instrument in Mastering the Content of Design and Technology Subject in High School. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 1043-1052.
Isa, N. S., & Ma’arof, N. N. M. I. (2018). Keberkesanan penggunaan grafik berkomputer sebagai alat bahan bantu mengajar dalam kalangan pelajar reka bentuk dan teknologi. Sains Humanika, 10(3-3).
Isa, Z., Zakaria, A. M., Azlan, M. I., Noorani, M. S. M., Majid, N., Ismail, H., ... & Suradi, N. R. M. (2011). Students’ perceptions of the implementation of teaching and learning of Science and Mathematics in English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 361-366.
Ishak, T., & Mohamed, M. (2010). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran sains dan matematik dalam bahasa inggeris (PPSMI): Suatu isu berulang. Sains Humanika, 53(1).
Ismail, S. (2012). Kesediaan guru terhadap pelaksanaan mata pelajaran Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi (RBT) sekolah rendah di Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia).
Jalaluddin, N. H., & Syah, A. H. (2009). Penelitian makna imbuhan Pen-Dalam Bahasa Melayu: Satu kajian rangka rujuk silang. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 9(2).
Kaur, K. (2020, February 5). PPSMI: Why Malaysian Education System Keeps Switching Languages. TRP. https://www.therakyatpost.com/2020/02/04/kabhi-malay-kabhi-english-a-history-of-language-in-malaysias-education-system/
Kim, J., Tatar, B., & Choi, J. (2014). Emerging culture of English-medium instruction in Korea: experiences of Korean and international students. Language and Intercultural Communication, 14(4), 441-459.
Kiong, T. T., Saien, S., Yunos, J. M., Heong, Y. M., Mohamad, M. M., Azman, M. N. A., & Hanapi, Z. (2018). Teori PenyelesaianMasalah Inventif (TRIZ) Bagi Matapelajaran Reka Bentuk Dan Teknologi. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners.
Kocakulah, S., Ustunluoglu, E., & Kocakulah, A. (2005, December). The effect of teaching in native and foreign language on students' conceptual understanding in science courses. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching (Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-30). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2015) ‘Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tingkatan 1’.
Lan, O. S., & Tan, M. (2008). Mathematics And Science in English: Teachers Experience Inside the Classroom. Journal of Educators & Education/Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 23.
Le Ha, P., Kho, J., & Chng, B. (2013). Nation building, English as an international language, medium of instruction, and language debate: Malaysia and possible ways forward. Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 58-71.
Madya, D., Buntat, Y., Saud, M. S., & Ahmad, S. F. (2018). Masalah Pembelajaran Matematik Tahun Lima Dalam Bahasa Inggeris.
Majid, N., Jaaman, S. H., Darus, M., Nazar, R. M., Ramli, S. N. M., Suradi, N. R. M., ... & Ali, Z. M. (2011). The readiness of mathematics and science lecturers to teach in English from students’ perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 342-347.
Malaysia, K. P. (2015). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2015-2025 (Pendidikan Tinggi). Putrajaya, Malaysia: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Mendeng, J., & Abdol, M. J. (2004). Pelaksanaan Pengajaran Sains Dan Matematik Dalam bahasa Inggeris: Tinjauan Pada Persepsi Pelajar Di Tiga buah Sekolah Sekitar Daerah Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia).
Mohd Taha, N. (2014). Stres guru yang mengajar subjek Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi (RBT) di sekolah rendah di Kuantan (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia).
Moktar, S. N. A., Hanapi, Z., Kiong, T. T., Mohamed, S., & Rus, R. C. (2018). Kesediaan, Penerimaan Dan Pengoperasian Guru Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi Terhadap Amalan dalam Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah. Sains Humanika, 10(3-3).
Noble, J. P., Roberts, W. L., & Sawyer, R. L. (2006). Student Achievement, Behavior, Perceptions, and Other Factors Affecting ACT Scores. ACT Research Report Series, 2006-1. ACT, Inc.
Nor, F. M., Aziz, M. A., & Jusoff, K. (2011). Should English for teaching mathematics and science (ETeMS) in Malaysia be abolished. World applied sciences journal, 12(Special Issue on Creating a Knowledge Based society), 36-40.
Pandian, A., & Ramiah, R. (2004). Mathematics and science in English: Teacher voice. The English Teacher, 33(11), 2004-2050.
Phillipson, R. (2009). English in globalisation, a Lingua Franca or a Lingua Frankensteinia?. TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 335-339.
Pillay, H. (2003). Winds of change: Teaching Science and Mathematics in English–A perspective from the school. IPBA e-Journal, 1-5.
Racha, N. (2003). A survey on the readiness of students to learn Mathematics in English. Unpublished BA thesis, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia.
Rahmadani, D. (2016). Students’ perception of English as a medium of instruction (EMI) in English classroom. Journal on English as a foreign language, 6(2), 131-144.
Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2007). Theorizing student voice: Values and perspectives. Improving schools, 10(1), 5-17.
Rudduck, J. (2006). The past, the papers and the project. Educational Review, 58(2), 131-143.
Sahaat, Z., & Nasri, N. M. (2020). Cabaran Pelaksanaan Mata Pelajaran Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi Sekolah Menengah (Challenges in the Implementation of Design and Technology Subject in Secondary School). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia (Malaysian Journal of Education), 45(1SI), 51-59.
Suliman, A., Nor M. Y. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2017). Dual-language programme in Malaysian secondary schools: Glancing through the students’ readiness and unravelling the unheard voices. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 17(4).
Thang, S. M., & Olaybal, D. L. (2006). Creating And Testing a Science in English Website For Malaysian Secondary One Students. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 3(1), 36-42.
Usunier, J. C., & Roulin, N. (2010). The influence of high-and low-context communication styles on the design, content, and language of business-to-business web sites. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 47(2), 189-227.
Wachter, B., & Maiworm, F. (Eds.). (2014). English-taught programs in European higher education: The state of play in 2014. Lemmens Medien GmbH.
Wu, W. S. (2006). Students’ attitudes toward EMI: Using Chung Hua University as an example. Journal of Education and Foreign Language and Literature, 4, 67-84.
Xu, M. (1991). The impact of English-language proficiency on international graduate students' perceived academic difficulty. Research in Higher Education, 32(5), 557-570.
Yahaya, M. F. B., Noor, M. A. B. M., Mokhtar, A. A. B., Rawian, R. B. M., Othman, M. B., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Teaching of Mathematics and Science in English: The Teachers' Voices. English Language Teaching, 2(2), 141-147.
Yassin, S. M., Marsh, D., Tek, O. E., & Ying, L. Y. (2009). Learners’ perceptions towards the teaching of science through English in Malaysia: A quantitative analysis. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 54-69.
Yunus, M. M., & Sukri, S. I. A. (2017). The Use of English in Teaching Mathematics and Science: The PPSMI Policy vis-à-vis the DLP. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(1), 133-142.
Zubairi, A. M., & Sarudin, I. H. (2009). Motivation to learn a foreign language in Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 9(2).
