Examining Procedural and Legal Exclusion of Employees in Malaysian Corporate Insolvency
Abstract
This paper examines the procedural and legal exclusion of employees during corporate insolvency in Malaysia, highlighting gaps between statutory protections and practical outcomes. Despite being recognized as preferential creditors under the Companies Act 2016, employees often experience significant delays, lack of procedural inclusion, and partial or no compensation. Using organisational justice theory as an analytical lens, the paper explores how principles of procedural and distributive fairness are compromised within Malaysia’s insolvency framework. Doctrinal analysis of statutes, case law, and judicial interpretation reveals a persistent creditor-centric approach reinforced by rigid formalism and fragmented legal provisions. Comparative insights from Australia and France demonstrate the importance of institutional safeguards, particularly wage protection funds, which Malaysia currently lacks. These findings underscore that statutory recognition alone is insufficient without mechanisms that ensure timely enforcement and participation for employees. The paper argues that aligning insolvency processes with justice-based principles can enhance institutional legitimacy and public trust. Policy recommendations include the establishment of a wage protection scheme, procedural integration of employee representation, and judicial training to promote fairness-oriented decision-making. This conceptual analysis contributes to Malaysian insolvency scholarship by reframing employee protection as a question of legal interpretation, procedural justice, and social responsibility rather than mere statutory hierarchy. This conceptual paper provides policy recommendations to enhance fairness and institutional trust in insolvency law.
Downloads
References
Aldahmash, A. (2025). The petition for a liquidation procedure and the administrative liquidation procedure: A comparative analysis study in Saudi and UK insolvency law. International Journal of Law and Management. Advance online publication.
Anderson, H. (2014). The protection of employee entitlements in insolvency: An Australian perspective. Melbourne University Publishing.
André, C., & Demmou, L. (2022). Enhancing insolvency frameworks to support economic renewal (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1739). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/8ef45b50-en
Association pour la gestion du régime de garantie des créances des salariés (AGS). (2025). Association pour la gestion du régime de garantie des créances des salariés. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_pour_la_gestion_du_r%C3%A9gime_de_garantie_des_cr%C3%A9ances_des_salari%C3%A9s
Bidin, A., Othman, R., Ramli, A., & Shahruddin, S. (2012). Protection of employees’ entitlements in cases of employer insolvency in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society, 13(2), 209–223.
Burke, K., & Leben, S. (2024). Procedural fairness: A key ingredient in public satisfaction. Court Review, 60(1), 26–37.
Chen, T. W., Azmi, R., & Abdul-Rahman, R. (2020). Paradigm shift from a liquidation culture to a corporate rescue culture in Malaysia: A legal review. International Insolvency Review, 29(2), 181–203.
Chen, T. W., Azmi, R., & Abdul-Rahman, R. (2024). The path to judicial management in Malaysia is paved with obstacles: Lessons from Singapore and the United Kingdom. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 19(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2024.3
Davis, K., Pargendler, M., & Lessa, M. E. (2025). Legal heterodoxy in the Global South: Priority of workers versus secured creditors in insolvency. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5250599
Department of Employment and Workplace Relations. (2025, July 29). What you can claim. Australian Government. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.dewr.gov.au/fair-entitlements-guarantee
Direction de l’information légale et administrative (Premier ministre). (2025, July 1). Régime de garantie des salaires (AGS). Entreprendre.Service-Public.fr. https://entreprendre.service-public.fr/vosdroits/F31409
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law's empire. Harvard University Press.
Gant, J. L. L. (2022). Optimising fairness in insolvency and restructuring: A spotlight on vulnerable stakeholders. International Insolvency Review, 31(1), 1–25.
Gant, J. L. L. (2023). Vulnerability theory and insolvency law. In E. Ghio, J. M. Wood, & J. L. L. Gant (Eds.), Re-examining insolvency law and theory: Perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 166–188). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/q0363/vulnerability%E2%80%91theory%E2%80%91and%E2%80%91insolvency%E2%80%91law
Gant, J. L. L. (2025). Power, choice, exposure and fragility: Reframing fairness in equity for the corporate and insolvency sphere. International Insolvency Review, e70006. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/iir.70006
Geok, Y. L. (2021). A critical analysis of employee protection in Malaysian insolvency law. Malayan Law Journal, 3, 45–61.
Geva, E. Z. (2011). Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Insolvency Law: Employee Participation in Corporate Insolvency Restructuring. European Business Organization Law Review, 12(2), 315–352. doi:10.1017/S1566752911200053
Global Legal Insights. (2025, June 10). Employment and labour laws and regulations: France. https://www.globallegalinsights.com/practice-areas/employment-and-labour-laws-and-regulations/france
Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22.
Gurrea-Martínez, A. (2025). The digitalization of insolvency proceedings. International Insolvency Review (forthcoming). European Corporate Governance Institute Law Working Paper No. 865/2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5147008.
Ha, J. C., & Lee, J. W. (2022). Realization of a sustainable high-performance organization through procedural justice: The dual mediating role of organizational trust and organizational commitment. Sustainability, 14(3), 1259.
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford University Press.
Hotel Jaya Puri Bhd v National Union of Hotel Bar & Restaurant Workers. [1980] 1 MLJ 109 (Malaysia).
International Labour Organization. (2020). Protection of Workers’ Wage Claims in Enterprise Insolvency. [Fact sheet]. https://www.ilo.org/publications/protection-workers-wage-claims-enterprise-insolvency
Kamalnath, A. (2023). The future of corporate insolvency law: A review of technology and AI-powered changes. International Insolvency. (forthcoming). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4532286
Kapur, S. (2024). The social dynamics of corporate insolvency law and workers/employees of distressed companies: Comparing select Asian jurisdictions. European Corporate Governance Institute – Law Working Paper No. 783/2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4882446
Lee, S., & Ker, N. (2025, May 5). Malaysia to adopt UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. The Malaysian Lawyer. https://themalaysianlawyer.com/2025/05/05/malaysia-adopt-model-law-cross-border-insolvency/#google_vignette
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). Springer.
Malaysia Department of Insolvency. (2025). Brief note: Disember 2024 (Liquidation) (p.6). https://www.mdi.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/BRIEFNOTELIKUIDASIDISEMBER2024.pdf
Mohd Ali, H. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on corporations in Malaysia from a corporate restructuring and insolvency law perspective. In Corporate Restructuring in Times of Crisis (pp. 143–161). Springer.
Mucciarelli, F. M. (2017). Employee insolvency priorities and employment protection in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Society, 44(3), 295–321.
Nuryanto, A. D., Kusumaningtyas, R. O., & Habibullo, B. (2024). The imperative of social justice on the insolvency and workers’ wage. Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues, 2(3), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v2i3.48
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Recommendation of the Council on Access to Justice and People-Centred Justice Systems (OECD/LEGAL/0498). OECD Legal Instruments. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0498
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Re Scomi Group Bhd. [2021] MLJU 2173 (Malaysia).
Shem, A. M., & Mupa, M. N. (2024). The role of stakeholder engagement in business rescue: A legal and strategic perspective. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 8(4), 38–56.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Erlbaum.
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361.
Vaccari, E. (2020). Promoting fairness in English insolvency valuation cases. International Insolvency Review, 29(3), 249–268.
Vaccari, E., & Van Ho, T. (2023). Insolvency law through the lens of human rights theories. In E. Ghio, J. L. L. Gant, & J. Wood (Eds.), Re-examining insolvency law theories: Perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 190–215). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803928760.00019
Ying & Partners Advocates & Solicitors. (2024, October 18). Employees’ wages claims in employer insolvency. https://yinglaw.com.my/2024/10/18/corporate-liabilities-in-malaysia-part-2-employees-wages-claims-in-employer-insolvency/
