The Elite Construction Post-Authoritarianism Suharto

  • Taufik Taufik Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Muhamad Nadzri Mohamed Noor Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Jamaie Hamil Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Keywords: Authoritarianism, Democracy, Elite Adjustment, Indonesia, Oligarchy

Abstract

Suharto's New Order rule has ended with various political and economic dynamics and a vision of progressive development every five years. Suharto's New Order government became authoritarian for the sake of stability built in all regions of Indonesia, utilizing various power networks such as the military, businessmen, and oligarchs, and using Golkar as a political “boat” in every election. After the fall of Suharto, the remnants of elements of power and the oligarchs still existed in the reform era until the current Jokowi administration. The data was obtained through a literature study, a literature review, and in-depth interviews with a qualitative approach. The number of informants who were met was four informants. In addition, the views of scholars who are referred to are also to strengthen the arguments of the ideas that are designed and compiled. In analyzing, this article emphasizes inductive patterns or patterns of relationships between theoretical, conceptual, and empirical relationships. This article identifies how the transformation of the political and business elites, or the classical oligarchy that once lived forever in the New Order era, adjusted the situation and conditions of the political regime. In addition, this paper also shows that there is a phase of elite adjustment that impacts the emergence of a new style of authoritarianism in Indonesia. This article is to see how the elites adjusted themselves after the “Reformasi” in Indonesia with various political maneuvers, either involving themselves in the government or becoming trend setters outside the government until the Jokowi administration era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ananta, A., Arifin, E. N., & Suryadinata, L. (2005). Emerging Democracy in Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State of in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

Aspinall, E., Mietzner, M., & Tomsa, D. (2015). The moderating president: Yudhoyono’s decade in power. In E. Aspinall, M. Mietzner, & D. Tomsa (Eds.), The Yudhoyono Presidency: Indonesia’s Decade of Stability and Stagnation. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Chua, C. (2008). Chinese Big Business in Indonesia: The state of capital. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In Sage Publications. Sage Publication, Inc.

Crouch, H. (1978). The Army and Politics in Indonesia. Cornell University Pres.

Diamond, L. (1994). Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0041

Elson, R. E. (2005). Suharto: Sebuah Biografi Politik. Pustaka Minda Utama.

Fukuoka, Y. (2013). Oligarchy and Democracy in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Political Studies Review, 11(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00286.x

Gandhi, J., & Ong, E. (2019). Committed or Conditional Democrats? Opposition Dynamics in Electoral Autocracies. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12441

Gatra, S. (2014). Pemilu 1971, Demokrasi Semu. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2014/01/11/1932246/Pemilu.1971.Demokrasi.Semu

Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford University Press.

Hadiz, V. R., & Robison, R. (2013). The Political Economy of Oligarchy and the Reorganization of Power in Indonesia. Indonesia, October(96), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.96.0033

Jenkins, D. (2010). Suharto and His Generals: Indonesian Military Politics, 1975-1983. Equinox Publishing (Asia) Pte.Ltd.

Lane, M. (2008). Unfinished Nation: Indonesia Before and After Suharto. Verso.

Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.

MacIntyre, A. (1998). Political Institutions and the Economic Crisis in Thailand and Indonesia. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 15(3), 362–372.

Margiansyah, D. (2019). Populisme di Indonesia Kontemporer: Transformasi Persaingan Populsime dan Konsekuensinya dalam Dinamika Kontestasi Politik Menjelang pemilu 2019. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i1.783

Mietzner, M. (2012). Indonesia’s Democratic Stagnation: Anti-Reformist Elites and Resilient Civil Society. Democratization, 9(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572620

Mietzner, M. (2019). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266

Mortimer, R. (1973). Indonesia: Growth or Development? In Rox Mortimer (Ed.), Showcase: The Illusion of Indonesia’s “Accelerated Modernisation.” Angus and Robertson PYT LTD.

Muhtadi, B. (2013). Politik Uang dan Dinamika Elektoral di Indonesia: Sebuah kajian Awal Interaksi antara “Party-ID” dan Patron-Klien. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 10(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v10i1.217

Muhtadi, B. (2019). Politik Uang dan New Normal dalam Pemilu Paska-Orde Baru. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 5(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.413

O’Rourke, K. (2002). Reformasi:The Struggle for Power in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. Allen &Unwin.

Permana, P. A. (2017). Local Elite Adjustment in Indonesia’s Democratization: Case Studies North Sumatra and East Java, 1998-2003 [Doctoral Dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs Universität Freiburg]. https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/12936

Reeve, D. (2013). Golkar: Sejarah Yang Hilang, Akar Pemikiran dan Dinamika. Komunitas Bambu.

Ridha, M. (2020). Kekhususan Oligarki: Pemikiran Jeffrey Winters Mengenai Oligarki. In A. M. Mudhoffir & C. H. Pontoh (Eds.), Oligarki: Teori dan Praktik. Marjin Kiri.

Robison, R., & Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. Routledge.

Said, S. (2016). Menyaksikan 30 Tahun Pemerintahan Otoriter Soeharto. PT. Mizan Pustaka.

Suparno, B. A. (2012). Reformasi dan Jatuhnya Soeharto. Kompas.

Syafiie, I. K. (2020). Sejarah Pemerintahan: Sejarah Agama dan Sejarah Negara. Pustaka Pelajar.

Tap MPRS RI No XI/MPRS/1966 tentang Pemilihan Umum. (1966).

Tomsa, D. (2008). Party Politics and Democratization in Indonesia: Golkar in the post-Suharto era. Routledge.

Tresna, N. (2021). MK: Inkonstitusional Bersyarat, UU Cipta Kerja Harus Diperbaiki dalam Jangka Waktu Dua Tahun. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=17816#

Undang-Undang No 15 Tahun 1969. (1969).

Vatikiotis, M. R. J. (1999). Indonesian Politics under Suharto: The Rise and Fall of the New Order (Third Edit). Routledge.

Ward, K. (1973). Indonesia’s Modernisation: Ideology and Practice. In Rex Mortimer (Ed.), Showcase State: The Illusion of Indonesia’s “Accelerated Modernisation.” Angus and Robertson PYT LTD.

Ward, K. (1974). The 1971 election in Indonesia: an East Java case study. Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University.

Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press.

Published
2023-06-30
Section
Articles