Tahap Pengintegrasian STEM dalam Meningkatkan Kesedaran Murid Terhadap Tenaga Boleh Diperbaharui

  • Zetty Zuryanty Zawawi Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Ruhizan Mohd Yasin Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Keywords: Pengintegrasian STEM, Murid sekolah menengah, Kesedaran, Tenaga boleh diperbaharui

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti sejauh mana tahap pengintegrasian pengetahuan, kemahiran, dan nilai STEM dilaksanakan dalam mata pelajaran Sains untuk meningkatkan kesedaran murid terhadap tenaga boleh diperbaharui. Kajian tinjauan ini menggunakan soal selidik sebagai instrumen kajian. Responden kajian terdiri daripada 300 orang murid tingkatan empat di dua buah sekolah di daerah Serian, Sarawak. Data kajian ini dianalisis melalui program The Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences versi 26.0. Kaedah analisis deskriptif digunakan untuk menunjukkan min dan sisihan piawai. Hasil kajian mendapati tahap pengintegrasian pengetahuan, kemahiran dan nilai STEM untuk meningkatkan kesedaran murid terhadap tenaga boleh diperbaharui adalah tinggi. Terdapat hubungan yang sederhana positif dan signifikan antara tahap pengintegrasian STEM dan tahap kesedaran murid terhadap tenaga boleh diperbaharui. Implikasi kajian ialah bagi mengukuhkan kesedaran murid terhadap tenaga boleh diperbaharui, maka tahap pengintegrasian STEM turut perlu dipertingkatkan untuk membentuk pendidikan tenaga yang lebih efektif dan bermakna kepada bakal pelapis bidang tenaga di Malaysia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, J. (2002). Pemupukan budaya penyelidikan di kalangan guru di sekolah: Satu penilaian. The National University of Malaysia.

Basri, S., Zakaria, S. U., & Kamarudina, S. K. (2021). Review on Alternative Energy Education in Malaysia. J. Kejuruteraan, 33, 461-472. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2021-33(3)-08

Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum Integration and The Disciplines of Knowledge. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616-622.

Bell, F. (2009). Connectivism: A network theory for teaching and learning in a connected world. Education Developments : The Magazine of the Staff and Educational Development Association, 10(3), 1-7.

Çelikler, D., & Aksan, Z. (2015). The opinions of secondary school students in Turkey regarding renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 75, 649-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.036

Chua, Y. P. (2014). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan (Edisi Ketiga). McGraw-Hill Education (M) Sdn. Bhd.

Duke, B., Harper, G., & Johnston, M. (2013). Connectivism as a digital age learning theory. The International HETL Review, 4-13.

Fang, T. P., Daud, W. R. W., Halim, L., & Masdar, M. S. (2021). How Ready is Renewable Energy? A Review Paper on Educational Materials and Reports Available for the Teaching of Hydrogen Fuel Cells in Schools. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 6(2), 01-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.25046/aj060201

Fitriana, N. (2018). STEM Education And Mini Water Heater On Project Based Learning For Renewable Energy, Sdgs To Improve Awarness Plastic Waste. International Symposium on Open, Distance, and E-Learning, 1(1), 256-269. https://doi.org/10.32550/pi.v1i1.39

Haron, S. A., Paim, L., & Yahaya, N. (2005). Towards sustainable consumption: an examination of environmental knowledge among Malaysians. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(5), 426-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00460.x

Illias, H. A., Ishak, N. S., & Alam, N. A. M. N. (2020). Awareness of Secondary School Students in Petaling Jaya Malaysia Towards Renewable Energy. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 10(4), 1645-1654.

Irmak, E., Ayaz, M. S., Gok, S. G., & Sahin, A. B. (2014). A survey on public awareness towards renewable energy in Turkey. 2014 International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA), (pp. 932-937). IEEE. 10.1109/ICRERA.2014.7016523

Jusup, Y., & Sharif, S. (2021). Kajian Analisis Keperluan: Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Literasi Tenaga Pengintegrasian STEM Sekolah Rendah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(8), 325 - 338. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i8.934

Kandpal, T. C. & Broman, L. (2014). Renewable energy education: A global status review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 300-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.039

Kardooni, R., Yusoff, S. B., & Kari, F. B. (2016). Renewable energy technology acceptance in Peninsular Malaysia. Energy policy, 88, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.005

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1-11. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Panduan Pelaksanaan STEM dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.

Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind The Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are The Barriers To Pro-Environmental Behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

Lay, Y. F., Khoo, C. H., Treagust, D., & Chandrasegaran, A. (2013). Assessing secondary school students' understanding of the relevance of energy in their daily lives. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(1), 199-215.

Leonard, D. C. (2002). Learning theories, A to Z (First Edition). Greenwood Publishing Group.

Marican, S. (2005). Kaedah Penyelidikan Sains Sosial. Prentice Hall, Pearson Malaysia.

Mayasari, T., Susilowati, E., & Winarno, N. (2019). Practicing integrated STEM in renewable energy projects: solar power. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5), p. 052033. IOP Publishing.

Middleton, P. (2018). Sustainable living education: Techniques to help advance the renewable energy transformation. Solar Energy, 174, 1016–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.08.009

Morgil, I., Secken, N., Yucel, A. S., Oskay, O. O., Yavuz, S., & Evrim, U. R. A. L. (2006). Developing a renewable energy awareness scale for pre-service chemistry teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 63-74.

Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1289775

Neo, L.S., Ching, L.Y., Hong, E.N. & Eng, L. (2016). Buku Teks Kimia Tingkatan 4. Abadi Ilmu.

Nordine, J., Krajcik, J. & Fortus, D. (2011). Transforming energy instruction in middle school to support integrated understanding and future learning. Science Education, 95(4), 670–699. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20423

Nowotny, J., Dodson, J., Fiechter, S., Gür, T. M., Kennedy, B., Macyk, W., & Rahman, K. A. (2018). Towards global sustainability: Education on environmentally clean energy technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2541-2551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.060

Ocetkiewicz, I., Tomaszewska, B. & Mróz, A. (2017). Renewable energy in education for sustainable development. The Polish experience. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.144

Papert, S. (1991). Situating Construction. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Ablex Publishing.

Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating Construcionism. Constructionsm, 36(2), 1–11.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of Intelligence in Children. International Universities Press.

Ponce, P., Molina, A., Mata, O., & Baltazar, G. (2019). LEGO EV3 Platform for STEM Education in Elementary School. Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology, 177-184.https://doi.org/10.1145/3318396.3318426

Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318396.3318426

Shriram, R., & Warner, S. C. (2010). Connectivism and the impact of Web 2.0 technologies on education. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 4–17.

Slavinec, M., Aberšek, B., Gacevic, D., & Flogie, A. (2019). Monodisciplinarity in Science versus Transdisciplinarity in STEM Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(3), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.435

Smidt, H., Thornton, M., & Abhari, K. (2017). The Future of Social Learning: A Novel Approach to Connectivism. Proceeding of the 50th Hawaii Conference on System Sciences, 2116–2125.

Tortop, H. S. (2012). Awareness and Misconceptions of High School Students about Renewable Energy Resources and Applications: Turkey Case. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(3), 1829-1840.

Venville, G., Rennie, L., & Wallace, J. (2004). Decision Making and Sources of Knowledge: How Students Tackle Integrated Tasks in Science, Technology and Mathematics. Research in Science Education, 34, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000033762.75329.9b

Published
2023-06-30
Section
Articles