Reviewing How Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Affect the Ability in Following Instructions

Mohamad Azhari Abu Bakar; Kartini Abd Ghani; Norehan Zulkiply

doi:10.47405/mjssh.v8i7.2424

Mohamad Azhari Abu Bakar Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Kartini Abd Ghani Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Norehan Zulkiply Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i7.2424

Keywords: Individual differences, Working memory capacity, Following instructions

Abstract

This literature review aims to analyze the role of individual differences in working memory capacity in following instructions based on theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Individual differences in working memory capacity have an impact on the encoding, and retrieval stage. In general, the output from the review stated that the performance difference between individuals relates to the experimental design and treatment, which include delivery of the instructions, presentation of objects, the length of instructions, involvement of dual tasks, and retrieval methods. In addition, the contents of instructions can be transferred into working memory space if the individuals can give a high level of attention and control the attention to suppress the distractors. Therefore, the ability to follow instructions depends on the individual's understanding of the instructions' meaning and matching them with the available space of their working memory (capacity). This review also adds value and suggestions to the need to conduct more research on the role of working memory capacity in following instructions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, R. J., Hill, L. J., Eddy, L. H., & Waterman, A. H. (2020). Exploring the effects of demonstration and enactment in facilitating recall of instructions in working memory. Memory & cognition, 48(3), 400-410.

Allen, R.J., Waterman, A.H., Yang, T., & Jaroslawska, A.J. (2022). Working memory in action: Remembering and following instructions. In R.H. Logie, Z. Wen, S.E. Gathercole, N. Cowan, & R.W. Engle (Eds.) Memory in science for society: There is nothing as practical as a good theory: Oxford University Press.

Allen, R. J., & Waterman, A. H. (2015). How does enactment affect the ability to follow instructions in working memory?. Memory & Cognition, 43(3), 555-561.

Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2006). Verbal and visuospatial short‐term and working memory in children: Are they separable?. Child development, 77(6), 1698-1716.

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.

Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(11), 417-423.

Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory. Current biology, 20(4), R136-R140.

Baddeley, A. D., Allen, R. J., & Hitch, G. J. (2011). Binding in visual working memory: The role of the episodic buffer. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1393-1400.

Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological bulletin, 130(4), 553.

Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & psychophysics, 8(5), 279-286.

Buszard, T., Farrow, D., Verswijveren, S. J., Reid, M., Williams, J., Polman, R., ... & Masters, R. S. (2017). Working memory capacity limits motor learning when implementing multiple instructions. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1350.

Cantor, J., & Engle, R. W. (1993). Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: An individual-differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1101.

Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological review, 99(1), 122.-387.

Catrambone, R. (1990). Specific versus general procedures in instructions. Human-Computer Interaction, 5(1), 49-93.

Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual review of psychology, 62, 73-101.

Coats, R. O., Waterman, A. H., Ryder, F., Atkinson, A. L., & Allen, R. J. (2021). Following instructions in working memory: do older adults show the enactment advantage?. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(4), 703-710.

Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 8(2), 331-335.

Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and brain sciences, 24(1), 87-114.

Cowan, N. (2005). Essays in cognitive psychology. Working memory capacity. New York, NY, US.

Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?. Progress in brain research, 169, 323-338.

Cowan, N. (2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational psychology review, 26(2), 197-223.

De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional science, 38(2), 105-134.

Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149.

Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336.

Fougnie, D. (2008). The relationship between attention and working memory. New research on short-term memory, 1, 45.

Gathercole, S. E., Lamont, E. M. I. L. Y., & Alloway, T. P. (2006). Working memory in the classroom. In Working memory and education (pp. 219-240). Academic Press.

Jaroslawska, A. J., Gathercole, S. E., Logie, M. R., & Holmes, J. (2016a). Following instructions in a virtual school: Does working memory play a role? Memory & Cognition, 44(4), 580-589.

Jaroslawska, A. J., Gathercole, S. E., Allen, R. J., & Holmes, J. (2016b). Following instructions from working memory: Why does action at encoding and recall help? Memory & Cognition, 44(8), 1183-1191.

Jaroslawska, A. J., Gathercole, S. E., & Holmes, J. (2018). Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(11), 2439-2449.

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort (Vol. 1063). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Karreman, J. (2004). Use and effect of declarative information in user instructions (Vol. 18). Rodopi.

Karreman, J., Ummelen, N., & Steehouder, M. (2005, July). Procedural and declarative information in user instructions: What we do and don't know about these information types. In IPCC 2005. Proceedings. International Professional Communication Conference, 2005. (pp. 328-333). IEEE.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2010). Techniques that reduce extraneous cognitive load and manage intrinsic cognitive load during multimedia learning. In Plass J. L., Moreno R., Brünken R. (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 131–152). Cambridge University Press.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.

Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge University Press.

Moreno, R., & Park, B. (2010). Cognitive load theory: historical development and relation to other theories. In J.L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp.9-28). Cambridge University Press.

Sarter, M., Gehring, W. J., & Kozak, R. (2006). More attention must be paid: the neurobiology of attentional effort. Brain research reviews, 51(2), 145-160.

Sepp, S., Howard, S. J., Tindall-Ford, S., Agostinho, S., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive load theory and human movement: Towards an integrated model of working memory. Educational Psychology Review, 1-25.

Slotnick, S. D., Schwarzbach, J., & Yantis, S. (2003). Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex. Neuroimage, 19(4), 1602-1611.

Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional science, 32(1-2), 9-31.

Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251-296.

Tindall-Ford, S., & Sweller, J. (2006). Altering the modality of instructions to facilitate imagination: Interactions between the modality and imagination effects. Instructional science, 34(4), 343-365.

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between Operation Span and Raven. Intelligence, 33(1), 67-81.

Yang, T. (2011). The role of working memory in following instructions. (Doctoral dissertation), University of York.

Yang, T.-X., Allen, R. J., Yu, Q., & Chan, R. C. K. (2015). The influence of input and output modality on following instructions in working memory. Scientific Reports, 5(17657), 1–8. doi:10.1038/srep17657

Yang, T. X., Su, X. M., Allen, R. J., Ye, Z., & Jia, L. X. (2022). Improving older adults' ability to follow instructions: benefits of actions at encoding and retrieval in working memory. Memory, 1-11.