Authoritarian Leadership Among Department Heads in Sabah, Malaysia: A Quantitative Study on Lecturers’ Perceptions

  • Fung Lan Yong Postgraduate Studies, Jesselton University College, 88300 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Florence Chuah Inclusive GEMS Consultancy, 46200 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Zongyong Xie Postgraduate Studies, Jesselton University College, 88300 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Steward G. Stephen Department of Social Science and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia Sarawak, 97008 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Sawanah Mumin Department of Social Science and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia Sarawak, 97008 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Loreta Ling Ling Uie Business Studies, Jesselton University College, 88300 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
Keywords: Authoritarian Leadership, Lecturers’ Perceptions, Private Higher Educational Institutions (PHEIs), Sabah, Malaysia

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to investigate lecturers’ perceptions of authoritarian leadership in Sabah, Malaysia. The sample consisted of 46 lecturers from three private higher educational institutions (PHEIs) located in Kota Kinabalu, who were asked to fill out the Authoritarian Leadership Questionnaire on Google Forms. Responses were subsequently transferred onto a spreadsheet and SPSS 29.0 was used to analyze the data. For this study, a 30 percent agreement on authoritarianism was deemed high and would fall into a concerning range especially within a democratic context. Findings showed that a high proportion (30.4 to 52.2 percent) of PHEI lecturers strongly agreed/agreed that department heads tend to practice authoritarian leadership. On the other hand, nonparametric tests revealed nonsignificant differences in perceived authoritarian leadership by way of gender, age, and job experience. Additionally, Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that 22 of the items were significant at p < .001, with medians significantly different from the hypothesized value of 3.5. Another 15 of the items were significant at p < .05, with medians significantly different from the hypothesized value of 3.5. In light of the findings, implications and recommendations on authoritarian leadership were made in the context of PHEIs in Sabah, Malaysia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Rani, N. S., Pa’wan, F., Che Musa, N., & Tajudin, M. M. (2008). Malaysian employees’ preference of their managers’ leadership style. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(5), 97-108. https://www.academia.edu/19978153/Malaysian_Employees_Preference_Of_Their_Managers_Leadership_Style

Abdullah, N., & Wahab, J. L. A. (2023). Principal autocratic leadership practice and its relationship with teacher job satisfaction in secondary schools of Jempol District, Negeri Sembilan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(9), 1953-1967. 10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i9/18637

Achimugu, L., & Obaka, H. P. (n. d.). Influence of principals’ leadership styles on senior secondary school students’ achievement in chemistry. Science Education International, 30(2), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i2.2

Alonso, T. (2025, May 1). Why democratic leadership brings better strategic results. Cascade. https://www.cascade.app/blog/why-democratic-leadership-brings-strategic-results

Asim, M., Liu, Z., Nadeem, M. A., Ghani, U., Arshad, M., & Xu, Y. (2021). Authoritarian leadership affects employee's helping behavior? The mediating role of rumination and moderating role of psychological ownership. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667348

Cherry, K. (2023, June 27). What Is autocratic leadership? Characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of autocratic leadership. VeryWell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-autocratic-leadership-2795314

Chiang, J. T. J., Chen, X. P., Liu, H., Akutsu, S., & Wang, Z. (2020). We have emotions but can’t show them! Authoritarian leadership, emotion suppression climate, and team performance. Human Relations, 74, 1082-1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720908649

Duan, J., Bao, C., Huang, C., & Brinsfield, C. T. (2017, January 18). Authoritarian leadership and employee silence in China. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-management-and-organization/article/abs/authoritarian-leadership-and-employee-silence-in-china/7BA708133A7360F1BA41CDE596F2E16C

de Hoogh, A. H. B., Greer, L. L., & den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Diabolical dictators or capable commanders? an investigation of the differential effects of autocratic leadership on team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 26, 687-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.01.001

Florida Tech (2023, May 1). What is authoritarian leadership? Florida Tech. https://online.fit.edu/degrees/graduate/master-organizational-leadership/what-is-authoritarian-leadership/

Garletts, D. M. (2016). Money and leadership: A study of superintendent contracts and the authoritarian or empowering leadership styles and actions of superintendents. [Doctoral thesis, Indiana State University]. https://scholars.indianastate.edu/etds/1675

Huang, Q., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., Bodla, A. A., & Zhu, D. (2022). When is authoritarian leadership less detrimental? The role of leader capability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 707. 10.3390/ijerph20010707

Hull, J. W. (2015, March 6). Learn to become a less autocratic manager. https://hbsp.harvard.edu/product/H01WYW-PDF-ENG

Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. L. D., Zagenczyk, T. J., Kiewitz, C., & Tang, R. L. (2010). In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 512-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.06.004.

Kirui, J. C., Yambo, J. M. O., & Langat, A. (2018). Influence of principals’ autocratic leadership style on teachers’ professional commitment in public secondary schools in Kericho Sub-County, Kenya. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 2(5), 336-341.

Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How

leadership influences student learning. https://wallacefoundation.org/sites/default/files/2023-07/How-Leadership-Influences-Student-Learning.pdf

London Premier Centre. (2011, July 26). The pros and cons of an authoritarian leadership

style. LPC. https://www.lpcentre.com/articles/the-pros-and-cons-of-an- authoritarian-leadership-style

Malaysian Qualifications Agency. (2014). Education programme standards. Malaysian Qualifications Agency. https://www2.mqa.gov.my/qad/garispanduan/Education%20Program%20Standard%20(EPS).pdf

Maurice, A. O., Buhere, P., & Alokam, P. J. (2019). Influence of headteachers’ autocratic leadership style on implementation of inclusive education in public primary schools in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(4), 1-14. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2019/April-2019/01.pdf

Munir, H., & Iqbal, M. Z. (2018). A study of relationship between leadership styles of principals and job satisfaction of teachers in colleges for women. Bulletin of Education and Research, 65-78. https://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/ier/PDF-FILES/5_40_2_18.pdf

Musa, K., Kin, T. M., Jamal@NordinYunus, Hamid, S. A., & Sedhu, D. S. (2020). Distributive Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 177–192. 10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i1/6978

Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Ooi, T. L. (2025, 27 May). Strengthening Malaysia’s private higher education sector through a structural revamp. Penang Institute. https://penanginstitute.org/publications/issues/strengthening-malaysias-private-higher-education-sector-through-a-structural-revamp/

Paiement, A-M., Dickie, N., & Pederson, K. (2024, September 4). Leadership in Malaysia: A cultural and psychological perspective. https://www.hoganassessments.com/news-events/updates/leadership-in-malaysia-cultural-psychological-perspective/

Parlar, H., Türkoğlu, M. E., & Cansoy, R. (2022). Exploring how authoritarian leadership affects commitment: The mediating roles of trust in the school principal and silence. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(1), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2021-0160

Peng, S., & Huang, Y. (2024). Teachers’ authoritarian leadership and students’ well-being: the role of emotional exhaustion and narcissism. BMC Psychology, 12, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02110-z

Pizzolitto, E., Verna, I., & Venditti, M. (2023). Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 73, 841–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00263-y

Rahmani, M., Roels, G., & Karmarkar, U. S. (2018). Team leadership and performance: combining the roles of direction and contribution. Management Science, 64, 5234–5249. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2911

Rast, D. E., Hogg, M. A., & Giessner, S. R. (2012). Self-uncertainty and support for autocratic leadership. Self and Identity, 12(6), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2012.718864

Rezky, S., Saragih, R., Fahira, R., Lubis, W., & Winara, W. (2024). The influence of authoritarian and democratic leadership styles on organizational climate in an educational environment. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 3(1), 482-487. 10.55299/ijere.v3i1.915

Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. https://www.amazon.com/Fundamental-Statistics Behavioral-International-processes/dp/0030919347

Rosing, F., Boer, D., & Buengeler, C. (2022). When timing is key: How autocratic and democratic leadership relate to follower trust in emergency contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904605

RUBIKTOP. (2023, September 14). The magic number 30: Why a sample size of 30 is often considered sufficient for statistical significance. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/magic-number-30-why-sample-size-often-considered-sufficient/

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sagie, A. (1996). Effects of leader’s communication style and participative goal setting on performance and attitudes. Human Performance, 9, 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0901_3

Salvador, M. X., & Silva, M. B. D. (2024) The impact of democratic and autocratic leadership styles on teacher performance in basic education school. International Journal on Integrated Education (IJIE), 7(4), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v7i4.5336

Scott, K. (2025, June 27). Leadership ≠ control: How to avoid the authoritarian spiral. Medium. https://kimmalonescott.medium.com/leadership-control-how-to-avoid-the-authoritarian-spiral-d571db17bcb4

Sengupta, D. (2014, August 6). 5 ways to avoid being an autocratic leader. Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/5-ways-to-avoid-being-an-autocratic-leader/articleshow/39656712.cms?from=mdr

Shen, Y., Chou, W. J., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2019) The roles of relational identification and workgroup cultural values in linking authoritarian leadership to employee performance. European Journal and Work Organizational Psychology, 28498–28509. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2019.1615453

Shonk, K. (2025, June 3). How an authoritarian leadership style blocks effective negotiation. The Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School. https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/leadership-skills-daily/how-an-authoritarian-leadership-style-blocks-effective-negotiation/

Tedla, B. A., Redda, E. H., & Vilas, G. (2021). Leadership styles and school performance: A study within an Eritrean context of Eastern Africa. International Journal of Management (IJM), 12(3),1152-1169. 10.34218/IJM.12.3.2021.109

Wang, D., Wang, Li., Wei, S., Yu, P., Sun, H., Jiang, X., & Hu, Y. (2022). Effects of authoritarian leadership on employees' safety behavior: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.846842

Winarsih, S. (2018). Gaya kepemimpinan kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kinerja guru. International Conference of Moslem Society, 2, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.24090/icms.2018.1864

Published
2025-11-21
How to Cite
Yong, F. L., Chuah, F., Xie, Z., G. Stephen, S., Mumin, S. and Ling Uie, L. L. (2025) “Authoritarian Leadership Among Department Heads in Sabah, Malaysia: A Quantitative Study on Lecturers’ Perceptions”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 10(11), p. e003664. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v10i11.3664.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>