Kesan Penerapan Pembelajaran Abad ke-21 Terhadap Kefahaman Murid Dalam Sains
Abstract
Pendidikan Sains masih lagi dikatakan sebagai satu pembelajaran yang kurang diminati oleh murid-murid kerana mereka menganggap subjek ini adalah sukar dan membosankan. Murid-murid juga tidak mendapat peluang dalam menjalankan aktiviti secara praktikal dan tahap keyakinan yang masih lemah dalam pembelajaran Sains. Oleh disebabkan itu, Pembelajaran Pak-21 telah digunakan bagi membolehkan murid memainkan peranan aktif dalam menguasai kemahiran berfikir yang kritis, kreatif,kolaboratif dan kemahiran lain yang diperlukan untuk menghadapi cabaran masa depan. Item Pelaporan Pilihan untuk Ulasan Sistematik dan Meta-Analisis (PRISMA) 2020 telah dijadikan panduan di dalam kajian ini. Sebanyak 10 artikel telah dipilih dan dimasukkan ke dalam kajian SLR yang dijalankan kerana menepati keseluruhan kriteria pemilihan yang ditetapkan. Dapatan kajian mendapati penggunaan pelbagai jenis teknologi dan strategi Pembelajaran Abad ke-21 yang berbeza seperti pembelajaran berasaskan projek, pembelajaran berasaskan inkuiri, pembelajaran berasaskan permainan digital, pembelajaran teradun dan pendekatan STEM. Dapatan kajian juga mendapati strategi Pembelajaran Abad ke-21 telah menunjukkan impak yang positif terhadap kefahaman dan pencapaian akademik murid. Cadangan kajian lanjutan ialah kajian yang lebih khusus berkaitan kesan penerapan Pembelajaran Abad ke-21 terhadap kefahaman murid sekolah menengah atau sekolah rendah dalam mata pelajaran Sains dan kajian berkaitan keberkesanan penggunaan teknologi secara spesifik dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran abad ke-21.
Downloads
References
Alhashem, F., & Alfailakawi, A. (2023). Technology-enhanced learning through virtual laboratories in chemistry education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13739
Almasri, F. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning of Science: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research. Research in Science Education, 54(5), 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3
Almasri, F. (2021). Collaborative learning in science education: effects of student’s gender attitudes and achievement in science education. University of Warwick, Retrieved from http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/ record=b3853208.
Alowayyid, N. N. S. (2023). The Reality of Middle School (Intermediate) Female Students in Saudi Arabia and the Practice of 21st-Century Skills: Teachers’ Perspective. Education Research International, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7869980
Alrawili, K. S., Osman, K., & Almuntasheri, S. S. (2022). Scaffolding Strategies in Promoting Attitudes of Saudi Middle School Science Students. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.30935/SCIMATH/11385
AlZahrani, A., & AlOtaibi, H. (2024). A Proposed Unit Based on the STEM Approach: Developing 21st-Century Skills Among Middle-School Students. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(2), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0046
Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Metacognitive Argument-Driven Inquiry in Teaching Antimicrobial Resistance: Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60
Bakhmat, N., Kolosova, O., Demchenko, O., Ivashchenko, I., & Strelchuk, V. (2022). Application of International Scientometric Databases in the Process of Training Competitive Research and Teaching Staff: Opportunities of Web of Science (Wos), Scopus, Google Scholar. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 100(13), 4914–4924.
Batz, A., D’Croz-Barón, D. F., Vega Pérez, C. J., & Ojeda-Sanchez, C. A. (2025). Integrating machine learning into business and management in the age of artificial intelligence. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04361-6
Boyd, L., Lu, Y., & Souppez, J. B. R. G. (2023). Pedagogy 4.0: Employability Skills and Computer Aided Design (CAD) Education for Industry 4.0. ICAC 2023 - 28th International Conference on Automation and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC57885.2023.10275222
Bozan, I., & Taslidere, E. (2025). Effect of the 5E model enriched with coding and digital game design activities on gifted students’ academic achievement and problem-solving skills. In Education and Information Technologies (Issue 0123456789). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13281-y
Cortes, S. T., Lorca, A. S., Pineda, H. A., Tubog, R., & Vilbar, A. (2024). Strengthening science education in basic education through a professional development program on participatory action research for science teachers. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101194
Dahalan, S. C., Ahmad, A. R., & Awang, M. M. (2020). The effectiveness of the 21st century teaching history module (21-Cthm) towards high order thinking skills. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(11), 106-120.
Galicia, P. R. B. (2021). Authentic assessment and academic performance of marine transportation students at the university of Antique, Philippines. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 14(4), 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2021.1962081
Galicia, P. R. B. (2022). Authentic assessment and academic performance of Marine Engineering students: A correlational study. Maritime Technology and Research, 4(3), 254984. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2022.25498
Grinnell, F. (2021). Scientific Inquiry, pluralism and complementarity. Scientific Inquiry Pluralism and Complementarity. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/gejwv.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2019). Reimagining public science education: the role of lifelong free-choice learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0013-x
Forcina, A., & Falcone, D. (2021). The role of Industry 4.0 enabling technologies for safety management: A systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 180(2019), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.260
Han, J., Kelley, T., & Knowles, J. G. (2023). Building a sustainable model of integrated stem education: investigating secondary school STEM classes after an integrated STEM project. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(4), 1499–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09777-8
Herunata, H., Ibnatullatiefah, I., Habiddin, H., Widarti, H. R., Munzil, M., & Fauziah, P. N. (2025). The effectiveness of guided inquiry learning based on Anderson’s sketch analysis on students’ higher order thinking skills in reaction rate. Ecletica Quimica, 50, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26850/1678-4618.eq.v50.2025.e1573
Ivanova, D., & Raykova, Z. (2023). Title Inquiry Based Learning Approach in Teaching “Phase Transitions” for Experimental Skills Formation in Nearly Sixteen-Year-Old Students. Proceedings of Science, 427(September), 1–15.
Kirk, M., & Ferguson, J. P. (2024). REAL possibilities: innovative and responsive curriculum enactment enabling impactful inquiry in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 0693, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2382388
Latif, A. H. A., Rahim, M. S. M., Ismail, A. W., Suaib, N. M., Aladin, M. Y. F., & Nor’A, M. N. A. (2020). Educational science game for early primary school. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 979(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/979/1/012012
Naidoo, J., & Reddy, S. (2023). Embedding Sustainable Mathematics Higher Education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era Post-COVID-19: Exploring Technology-Based Teaching Methods. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129692
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pantiwati, Y., Aminudin, Waluyo, L., Permana, F. H., Sari, T. N. I., & Nurrohman, E. (2025). E-Module Based on LI-PRO-GP Learning Model to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Problem-Solving Abilities in Science Learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(3), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.3.2265
Putro, B. L., Waslaluddin, Putra, R. R. J., & Rahman, E. F. (2019). Creative learning model as implementation of curriculum 2013 to achieve 21st century skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032034
Rachmadtullah, R., Yustitia, V., Setiawan, B., Fanny, A. M., Pramulia, P., Susiloningsih, W., Rosidah, C. T., Prastyo, D., & Ardhian, T. (2020). The challenge of elementary school teachers to encounter superior generation in the 4.0 industrial revolution: Study literature. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 1879–1882.
Rajakannu, A., Al Bulushi, A. H., & Vijayalakshmi, K. (2025). Navigating the Impediments and Challenges of Integrating Artificial Intelligence Technologies within the Framework of Education 4.0: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 73(3), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I3P125
Saad, A., Elbashir, A., Abdou, R., Alkhair, S., Ali, R., Parangusan, H., Ahmad, Z., & Al-Thani, N. J. (2024). Exploring of the gender variations in 4Cs skills among primary students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52(October 2023), 101510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101510
Suryandari, K., Rokhmaniyah, & Wahyudi (2021). The effect of scientific reading based project model in empowering creative thinking skills of preservice teacher in elementary school. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1329-1340. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1329
Trivandrum Anandapadmanabhan, L., Ramani, P., Ramadoss, R., Panneerselvam, S., & Sundar, S. (2022). Effect of COVID-19 on Dental Education: A Review. Cureus, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24455
Wu, J., Jin, Y., Xue, X., Zhang, P., & Miao, H. (2024). Maritime Technology and Research. Scholar.Archive.Org, 594(2), 234025. https://scholar.archive.org/work/g6l52gvusfhojlufuqf7xp53em/access/wayback/https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MTR/article/download/237647/163896
Yulianti, D., Sugianto, & Ngafidin, K. M. (2022). Scratch Assisted Physics Learning With a Stem Approach in the Pandemic Era To Develop 21St Century Learning Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.32607
Yusop, S. R. M., Rasul, M. S., Yasin, R. M., Hashim, H. U., & Jalaludin, N. A. (2022). An Assessment Approaches and Learning Outcomes in Technical and Vocational Education: A Systematic Review Using PRISMA. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095225
Zang, W., & Yan, J. (2024). Exercise interventions for nonspecific low back pain: a bibliometric analysis of global research from 2018 to 2023. Frontiers in Medicine, 11(April), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1390920
