Towards a More Asymmetrical Federation: Sarawak Regionalism and the Future of Malaysian Federalism

  • Ivy Anak Jugah Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Arnold Puyok Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia
Keywords: Asymmetrical federalism, Malaysia Agreement 1963, Malaysian federalism, Negotiated centralism, Sarawak regionalism

Abstract

This article examines Sarawak's post-2018 regionalism as a structurally significant driver of change in Malaysian federalism. Drawing on qualitative elite interview data from five key participants in the political, legal, and legislative domains, corroborated by official government and primary documentary sources spanning the period 2018 to 2026, the article argues that Sarawak's regionalism is contributing to a gradual shift towards a more negotiated and asymmetrical form of Malaysian federalism, characterised by incremental fiscal, resource, and administrative devolution within the Federation rather than comprehensive decentralisation or separation. Three core findings organise the analysis: first, greater autonomy is being achieved through incremental asymmetrical devolution of fiscal and resource powers; second, negotiation, encompassing federal-state bargaining, coalition leverage, and selective legal action, functions as the primary pathway; and third, the sustainability of these gains is conditioned on constitutional durability, governing capacity, development performance, and a transition beyond grievance-based regionalism. The article advances the concept of 'negotiated centralism' as a theoretically grounded account of how a sub-state region achieves meaningful asymmetrical gains within a formally centralised federal structure, without triggering comprehensive decentralisation or separation. An original 'constitutional covenant' framing of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 is also offered, positioning MA63 as a living constitutional framework for federal-state relations rather than a historical grievance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arban, E. (2023). Federalism, regionalism, sub-state nationalism: Some theoretical insights. In E. Arban (Ed.), Italian regionalism and the federal challenge (pp. 1–33). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31543-5_1

Attorney General's Chambers of Malaysia. (2022). Constitution (Amendment) Act 2022 (Act A1642). Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

Bhattacharyya, H. (2023). Concept of Asymmetric Federalism and the Politics of Recognition. In: Asymmetric Federalism in India. Federalism and Internal Conflicts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23727-0_2

Blöchliger, H., Montes-Nebreda, A. (2024). Diversity and Asymmetric Arrangements as Drivers of Fiscal Federalism: A Comparative Overview. In: Romero Caro, F.J., Valdesalici, A. (eds) Fiscal Federalism and Diversity Accommodation in Multilevel States: A Comparative Outlook. Federalism and Internal Conflicts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53759-2_2

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Teaching, Supervising and Examining for Quality Thematic Analysis. Thematic analysis: A practical guide, 1-34.

Broschek, J. (2024). Why federalism matters: policy feedback, institutional variation and the politics of trade policy-making in Canada and Germany. New Political Economy, 29(6), 944–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2024.2356546

Brinkmann, S. (2022). Qualitative interviewing: Conversational knowledge through research interviews (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197648186.001.0001

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Chandra, S. H. (2026, September 8). Sarawak awaits federal decision on Article 112D special grant formula. Sarawak Tribune. https://www.sarawaktribune.com/sarawak-awaits-federal-decision-on-article-112d-special-grant-formula/

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Dardanelli, P., Kincaid, J., Adeney, K., Moscovich, L., Olmeda, J. C., Schlegel, R., ... & Lacroix Eussler, S. (2023). Authoritarianism, democracy and de/centralization in federations: what connections?. Regional & Federal Studies, 33(5), 577-606.

Faruqi, S. S. (2026, April 28). At a crossroads: Malaysian federalism and special fiscal rights of Sabah and Sarawak. RSIS Commentary. https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/at-a-crossroads-malaysian-federalism-and-special-fiscal-rights-of-sabah-and-sarawak/

Harding, Andrew. (2012). The Constitution of Malaysia: A Contextual Analysis. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955695.

Harding, A. (2018). ‘A Measure of Autonomy’: Federalism as Protection for Malaysia’s Indigenous Peoples. Federal Law Review, 46(4), 557–574. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0067205X1804600405

Hueglin, T. O., & Fenna, A. (2015). Comparative federalism: A systematic inquiry (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.

Hutchinson, F. E., Onn, L. P., Hutchinson, F. E., & Onn, L. P. (2025). Striking While the Iron Is Hot: Sarawak and Federal-State Dynamics in Today’s Malaysia. In Striking While the Iron Is Hot: Sarawak and Federal-State Dynamics in Today’s Malaysia (pp. 1–54). Chapter, ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.

Ismail, M. A., & Yusoff, M. A. (2022). Asymmetrical federalism and anti-federal sentiment in Malaysia: The Sabah experience. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 19(7), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2022.1907.03

Jeffery, C. (2009). Devolution in the United Kingdom: Statehood and citizenship in transition. In N. McEwen & L. Moreno (Eds.), The territorial politics of welfare (pp. 1–20). Palgrave Macmillan.

Keating, M. (2013). Rescaling the European state: The making of territory and the rise of the meso. Oxford University Press.

Keating, M. (2022). Between two unions: UK devolution, European integration and Brexit. Territory, Politics, Governance, 10(5), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2050939

Mahoney, J., Thelen, K., & Thelen, K. (2010). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change (pp. 1–37). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806414.003

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Moland, M. (2024). Past Political Asymmetry and Present Public Opinion: How Has the Asymmetrical Federation of the EU Shaped Popular Opinion of Its Optimal Shape? Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 54(2), 361-385. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjae001

Moffitt, S. L., Willse, C., Smith, K. B., & Cohen, D. K. (2023). Centralization and subnational capacity: The struggle to make federalism work equitably in public education. Perspectives on Politics, 21(4), 1283–1303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721002012

Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

Kristin Mozihim, A., & Anwar, A. A. P. (2025). Tracing Autonomy: Sarawak’s Educational Governance from the Brooke Era to MA63. Journal of Administrative Science, 22(2), 97-125. https://doi.org/10.24191/jas.v22i2.8254

Petroliam Nasional Berhad. (2026, January 12). PETRONAS seeks clarity on petroleum regulatory framework in Sarawak. https://www.petronas.com/media/media-releases/petronas-seeks-clarity-petroleum-regulatory-framework-sarawak

Popelier, P. (2021). Dynamic Federalism: A New Theory for Cohesion and Regional Autonomy (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003128762

Prime Minister's Office of Malaysia. (2023, January 4). Special grants to Sabah, Sarawak should be reviewed—PM Anwar. https://www.pmo.gov.my/en/news-en/special-grants-to-sabah-sarawak-should-be-reviewed-pm-anwar/

Puyok, A. (2024). Autonomy in Sarawak and Sabah: Different Paths and Diverging Outcomes. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789815306187

Puyok, A., & Naim, H. M. (2023). Resurgence of regional coalitions in Sarawak and Sabah since the federal elections of 2018 and 2022. The Round Table, 112(3), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2023.2221913

Sabah and Sarawak Affairs Division. (2026). Dashboard MA63. Prime Minister's Department. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://bhess.jpm.gov.my/index.php/dashboard-ma63/

Sarawak Premier's Department. (2024). Sarawak demanding for devolution and decentralisation. https://premierdept.sarawak.gov.my/web/subpage/news_view/1686

Sarawak Public Communications Unit. (2025, November 26). Article 112D safeguards Sarawak's right to special grant. https://ukas.sarawak.gov.my/web/subpage/news_view/29389

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualisation and operationalisation. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Scoop Reporters. (2026, June 21). Sarawak reaches historic MA63 milestone with Bintulu Port takeover. Scoop. https://www.scoop.my/news/292212/sarawak-reaches-historic-ma63-milestone-with-bintulu-port-takeover/

Sharma, C. K., & Swenden, W. (2022). The dynamics of federal (in)stability and negotiated cooperation under single-party dominance: Insights from Modi's India. Contemporary South Asia, 30(4), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2022.2132218

Suznan, N. S., Lyndon, N., Yusoff, N. H., Othman, Z., & Abas, N. S. (2026). Constructive interventions to enhance public understanding and awareness of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) in Sarawak. Discover Global Society, 4, Article 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00414-6

M, W., & Shuaib, F. S. (2021). The distribution of petroleum resources in Malaysia: Unpacking federalism. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 13(5-6), 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwaa040

Watts, R. L. (2008). Comparing federal systems (3rd ed.). McGill–Queen's University Press.

Yimenu, B. (2023). Measuring and explaining de facto regional policy autonomy variation in a constitutionally symmetrical federation: The case of Ethiopia, 1995–2020. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 53(2), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjac039

Yeoh, T. (2020). Federal-state relations under the Pakatan Harapan government (Trends in Southeast Asia No. 12/2020). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/trends-in-southeast-asia/trends-in-southeast-asia-2020/federal-state-relations-under-the-pakatan-harapan-government-by-tricia-yeoh/

Yeoh, T. (2024). Managing State-Federal Relations: Growing Pressure on Malaysia’s Madani Administration. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789815306071

Yeoh, T., & Toroskainen, K. (2017). Case study: Malaysia. Shifting alliances based on subnational petroleum revenue sharing. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance and Natural Resource Governance Institute.

World Bank. (2025, October 2). Sarawak set to strengthen governance and long-term economic growth with new World Bank partnership. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/10/02/sarawak-set-to-strengthen-governance-and-long-term-economic-growth-with-new-world-bank-partnership

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Published
2026-09-23
Section
Articles