Capture without Transfer? Copyright Registration and Platform Enforcement through the Gugu Gaga Meme in China
Abstract
The article examines how voluntary copyright registration may support platform enforcement where underlying ownership remains unresolved, using the Gugu Gaga case in China. In July 2026, a ByteDance subsidiary registered two entries associated with a penguin-costume meme whose source image originated from an independent online creator, although the precise content of the deposited works remains unavailable. The study employs doctrinal legal analysis within a single-case design, supplemented by qualitative document analysis. It examines legislation, six Chinese judgments, four platform agreements, campaign rules, registration records and complaint guidelines, with online materials preserved as dated captures. The examined agreements do not establish a transfer of copyright ownership to the registrant. Registration supplied a public record and a favourable, rebuttable evidentiary position without resolving the underlying entitlement. The complaint procedures indicate that registration credentials may support enforcement before substantive ownership is adjudicated. No enforcement linked to these registrations was identified during the study period. The article argues that, where registration creates an enforcement-ready credential without resolving underlying ownership, registration may function as ‘capture infrastructure’ by strengthening a claimant’s procedural position while shifting the burden of challenge to others.
Downloads
References
com. (2026). Zijie tiaodong dengji “Gugu Gaga” “Daodun gou” deng wangluo biaoqingbao zhuzuoquan [ByteDance registers copyright in internet stickers including Gugu Gaga and Daodun Gou]. https://www.163.com/dy/article/L13JVKTH0519D45U.html
com. (2026a, March 10). AI er chuang xiang shangjia shou banquan fei, zhe zhi “Gugu Gaga” de qi’e, daodi suan shui de? [AI secondary creation charges merchants copyright fees: whose penguin is Gugu Gaga?]. https://news.17173.com/content/03102026/093843047.shtml
com. (2026b, July 4). Zijie tiaodong shenqing “Mingri fangzhou: Zhongmodi” er chuang xingxiang “Gugu Gaga” zhuzuoquan [ByteDance applies to register copyright in the Arknights: Endfield secondary-creation image Gugu Gaga]. https://news.17173.com/content/07042026/143821502.shtml
Beijing Douyin Technology Co., Ltd. (2026a). Douyin pingtai guanyu rengong zhineng shengcheng neirong de guifan ji hangye changyi [Douyin platform norms and industry initiative on AI-generated content]. Retrieved July 10, 2026, from https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/dou-yin-ai-rules/
Beijing Douyin Technology Co., Ltd. (2026b). Douyin qinquan tousu zhiyin [Douyin infringement complaint guidelines]. Retrieved July 20, 2026, from https://www.douyin.com/draft/douyin_agreement/infringement_guide.html
Beijing Douyin Technology Co., Ltd. (2026c). Douyin yonghu fuwu xieyi [Douyin user service agreement] (updated February 13, 2026; effective February 20, 2026). Retrieved July 10, 2026, from https://www.douyin.com/draft/douyin_agreement/douyin_agreement_user.html?id=6773906068725565448
Beijing Douyin Technology Co., Ltd. (2026d). Gugu Gaga youjiang chuangzuo huodong xiangxi guize [Gugu Gaga prize creation campaign detailed rules]. In-app activity page, 1-15 July 2026. Short link https://v.douyin.com/Xlb6_vjFXwA/ (expired). Screenshot on file with the author.
Beijing Internet Court. (2023). Li su Liu qinhai zuopin shuming quan, xinxi wangluo chuanbo quan jiufen [Li v. Liu] (2023) Jing 0491 Min Chu No. 11279.
Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, September 9, 1886, as revised at Paris on July 24, 1971.
Bilibili Inc. (2026a). Bilibili danmu wang yonghu shiyong xieyi [Bilibili user agreement]. Retrieved July 2026, from https://www.bilibili.com/protocal/licence.html
Bilibili Inc. (2026b). Bilibili qinquan tongzhi [Bilibili infringement notice guidance]. Retrieved July 20, 2026, from https://www.bilibili.com/v/copyright/intro
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Boyle, J. (2003). The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1–2), 33–74.
Changshu City People’s Court. (2024). Lin Chen su Hangzhou Gaosi qimo jishu youxian gongsi deng zhuzuoquan qinquan jiufen [Lin Chen v. Hangzhou Gaosi Air Membrane Technology Co., Ltd.] (2024) Su 0581 Min Chu No. 6697.
China Copyright Protection Center. (2026a). Zhuzuoquan hetong bei’an gonggao [Copyright contract filing announcements]. Retrieved July 10, 2026, from https://register.ccopyright.com.cn/
China Copyright Protection Center. (2026b). Zuopin dengji gonggao [Works registration announcement], Guo Zuo Deng Zi Nos. 2026-F-00157780 and 2026-F-00157779. Retrieved July 9, 2026, from https://register.ccopyright.com.cn/
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Gengxuetang. (2026, March 23). [Gugu Gaga explainer video]. Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1oSQZBRErs/
Ginsburg, J. C. (2003). The concept of authorship in comparative copyright law. DePaul Law Review, 52(4), 1063–1092.
Gugu Gaga. (2026). [Douyin account profile, Douyin ID 22709294903]. Douyin. Retrieved July 10, 2026, from https://www.douyin.com/user/MS4wLjABAAAAIAdIqSRCbyU44-CniWhWG3x78tL77LYbUd_jEWs7M6Oy0TFYQ_cDBnZsEbiog0f-?from_tab_name=main
He, T. (2017). Copyright and fan productivity in China: A cross-jurisdictional perspective. Springer.
Huang, H. (2025). Tan tan woguo de lifa tizhi [On China’s legislative system]. The People's Congress of China, (2), 54. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202502/t20250218_442863.html
Huang, Y. (2024). Rengong zhineng shengcheng neirong de ke banquan xing wenti bianxi [Analysis of the copyrightability of AI-generated content]. Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Renwen Shehui Kexue Ban), 54(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.06.118
Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70
Hypergryph Network Technology Co., Ltd. (2026a). Mingri fangzhou: Zhongmodi gongce PV: Back to Endfield [Arknights: Endfield open beta promotional video]. Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1XTkNB3Er9/
Hypergryph Network Technology Co., Ltd. (2026b). Yingjiao wangluo youxi shiyong xuke ji fuwu xieyi [Hypergryph game licence and service agreement]. Retrieved July 2026, from https://user.hypergryph.com/protocol/plain/endfield/service
Jiantu Sishungai. (2026, March 7). Guanyu jinqi yuqing de shuoming [Statement concerning recent public discussion]. Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/opus/1176910056622391313
Know Your Meme. (2026). Gugu Gaga penguin. Retrieved July 2026, from https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/gugu-gaga-penguin
Li, Y., & Huang, W. (2019). Taking users’ rights seriously: Proposed UGC solutions for spurring creativity in the internet age. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 9(1), 61–91. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2019.01.04
Liu, J. (2024). Wangluo baoli qinquan fa guizhi lujing de wanshan [Improving the tort-law regulatory path for online violence]. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 42(3), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0208.2024.03.006
National Copyright Administration of China. (1994). Zuopin ziyuan dengji shixing banfa [Trial measures for the voluntary registration of works]. https://www.ncac.gov.cn/xxfb/flfg/bmgz/202410/P020241015603746503748.pdf
National People’s Congress. (2018). Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo dianzi shangwu fa [E-Commerce Law of the People’s Republic of China].
National People’s Congress. (2020a). Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo minfadian [Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China].
National People’s Congress. (2020b). Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo zhuzuoquan fa [Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China].
Qichacha. (2026). [Corporate affiliation records for Beijing Douyin Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.]. Retrieved July 2026, from https://m.qcc.com/firm/747d3a16e63342ba57c8771bde561a9e.html
Ricketson, S., & Ginsburg, J. C. (2022). International copyright and neighbouring rights: The Berne Convention and beyond (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT Press.
Seng, D. (2021). Detecting and prosecuting IP infringement with AI: Can the AI genie repulse the forty counterfeit thieves? In J.-A. Lee, R. M. Hilty, & K.-C. Liu (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and intellectual property (ch. 14). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198870944.003.0014
Shanghai Songjiang District People’s Court. (2023). [Toy-bear copyright dispute] (2023) Hu 0117 Min Chu No. 1404.
Shenzhen Lianmeng Technology Co., Ltd. (2025). Jimeng AI yonghu fuwu xieyi [Jimeng AI user service agreement] (updated August 25, 2025; effective September 1, 2025). Retrieved July 2026, from https://lf9-cdn-tos.draftstatic.com/obj/ies-hotsoon-draft/vco/17620dba-f821-4a18-85f9-b8b11f73304a.html
Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press.
Sprigman, C. (2004). Reform(aliz)ing copyright. Stanford Law Review, 57(2), 485–568.
State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2013a). Xinxi wangluo chuanbo quan baohu tiaoli [Regulations on the protection of the right of communication through information networks].
State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2013b). Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo zhuzuoquan fa shishi tiaoli [Regulations for the implementation of the Copyright Law].
Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. (2002). Guanyu shenli zhuzuoquan minshi jiufen anjian shiyong falv ruogan wenti de jieshi [Interpretation on issues concerning the application of law in the trial of civil copyright disputes].
Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. (2020). Guanyu shenli she dianzi shangwu pingtai zhishi chanquan minshi anjian de zhidao yijian [Guiding opinions on the trial of civil intellectual property cases involving e-commerce platforms] (Fa Fa [2020] No. 32). https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun/xiangqing/254931.html
Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. (2021). Hangzhou Alibaba guanggao youxian gongsi su Shenzhen Netac keji youxian gongsi [Alibaba v. Netac] (2019) Zui Gao Fa Min Shen No. 5971. Reported in GRUR International, 72(6), 566–571 (2023).
Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. (2023). Guangzhou mou keji youxian gongsi su Anhui mou tushu youxian gongsi [Guangzhou Technology Co. v. Anhui Books Co.] (2022) Zui Gao Fa Zhi Min Zhong No. 1033.
The Paper. (2024, July 17). Yuangao: “Ni chaoxi wo!” Beigao: “Ni ye shi chao de.” [Plaintiff: “You copied me!” Defendant: “You copied too!”]. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_28104782
Thomas, A. (2023). Merit and monetisation: A study of video game user-generated content policies. Internet Policy Review, 12(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.1.1689
van Gompel, S. (2011). Formalities in copyright law: An analysis of their history, rationales and possible future. Kluwer Law International.
Van Hoecke, M. (Ed.). (2011). Methodologies of legal research: Which kind of method for what kind of discipline? Hart Publishing.
Wang, Q. (2017). Lun rengong zhineng shengcheng de neirong zai zhuzuoquan fa zhong de dingxing [On the characterisation of AI-generated content in copyright law]. Falv Kexue, (5), 148–155. http://iolaw.cssn.cn/fxyjdt/201711/t20171101_4654218.shtml
Wang, Q. (2022). Xiang yingyong chengxu shangdian fachu qinquan tongzhi de xianjie: Jian ping “Huya su Huana an” [The limits of infringement notices to app stores: Commenting on Huya v. Warner]. Zhongguo Banquan Fuwu. China Copyright, (2), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4717.2022.02.003
Wang, Q. (2023). Zai lun rengong zhineng shengcheng de neirong zai zhuzuoquan fa zhong de dingxing [Revisiting the characterisation of AI-generated content in copyright law]. Zhengfa Luntan, (4), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0208.2023.04.002
Watkins, D., & Burton, M. (Eds.). (2018). Research methods in law (2nd ed.). Routledge.
World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.
Wu, T. (2008). Tolerated use. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 31(4), 617–635.
Xu Toso. (2026, April 3). [Gugu Gaga community 3D model video]. Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Ns9uBiEHo/?spm_id_from=333.337.search-card.all.click&vd_source=ac6b7e317e18de6497691e86a39e6ec1
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Zhangjiagang People’s Court. (2024). Feng su Zhu [Feng v. Zhu] (2024) Su 0582 Min Chu No. 9015.
Zittrain, J., Albert, K., & Lessig, L. (2014). Perma: Scoping and addressing the problem of link and reference rot in legal citations. Legal Information Management, 14(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669614000255















