Affective Meaning in Language and Discourse: A Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
This study investigates the evolution, intellectual structure, and thematic analysis of affective meaning research using bibliometric analysis of 154 English-language articles and review articles from 1994 to 2025 in the Web of Science Core Collection. The publication trend, collaboration network, co-citation network, co-occurrence of keywords, clustering of themes, and temporal evolution were explored using CiteSpace. A significant increase in the number of research publications after 2018 is evident, as well as widespread geographic involvement and relatively scattered institutional and author collaboration. Cited-author and cited-journal networks, on the other hand, show a much larger common intellectual ground that includes systemic functional linguistics and Appraisal, stance and evaluation studies, corpus linguistics, pragmatics and interactional approaches. Some co-existing trends of research are also identified in the present corpus through keyword and cluster analyses using corpus-based, interactional, multimodal, cross-cultural, second-language and context-specific approaches. Temporal patterns suggest that these developments occurred in conjunction with ongoing language- and discourse-based issues, revealing a process of gradual thematic diversification instead of sudden thematic replacement. Therefore, the results suggest a field that, while intellectually connected, is conceptually plural. Future studies should focus on more explicitly comparing and integrating constructs that overlap, cross-linguistic validation, and methodological designs that integrate corpus and contextual evidence and multimodal interpretation.
Downloads
References
Bednarek, M. (2006). Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach. Text & Talk, 26(6), 635–660. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.027
Bednarek, M. (2008). Emotion talk across corpora. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712
Bednarek, M. (2009a). Dimensions of evaluation: Cognitive and linguistic perspectives. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(1), 146–175. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.1.05bed
Bednarek, M. (2009b). Language patterns and ATTITUDE. Functions of Language, 16(2), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.2.01bed
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du
Feng, D., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2012). Representing emotive meaning in visual images: A social semiotic approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(14), 2067–2084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.003
Firouzi, R., & Farahzad, F. (2025). A systematic review of appraisal theoretical research in translation studies published between 2017 and 2024. Iranian Journal of Translation Studies, 22(88), 44–60. https://journal.translationstudies.ir/ts/article/view/1221
Hunston, S. (2004). Counting the uncountable: Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus. In A. Partington, J. Morley, & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and discourse (pp. 157–188). Peter Lang.
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.001.0001
Li, J., Lei, L., & Cheng, L. (2020). Mapping evaluation, appraisal and stance in discourse (2000–2015): A bibliometric analysis. Glottotheory, 10(1–2), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2019-0002
Liu, Q. Y., Ang, L. H., Waheed, M., & Kasim, Z. M. (2022). Appraisal theory in translation studies—A systematic literature review. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 30(4), 1589–1605. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.4.07
Liu, Y., Wang, G., & Xiang, L. (2026). A bibliometric study of linguistic evaluation research and its implications (1992–2023). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, Article 436. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06789-w
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1989). Language has a heart. Text, 9(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7
Partington, A. (2004). “Utterly content in each other’s company”: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.07par
Phan, L. T. (2025). Tracing the development of research on Appraisal Theory within Systemic Functional Linguistics (2003–2025): A bibliometric analysis. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 52, 87–109. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.52.05
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (2010). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Pearson.
Zeng, J., Dong, M., & Fang, A. C. (2024). Annotating evaluative language: Challenges and solutions in applying Appraisal Theory. In H. Bunt, N. Ide, K. Lee, V. Petukhova, J. Pustejovsky, & L. Romary (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Joint ACL–ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation @ LREC-COLING 2024 (pp. 144–151). ELRA and ICCL. https://aclanthology.org/2024.isa-1.17/
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629















