The Relationship between Students’ Personality and Their Achievement in Solving Mathematics Higher Order Thinking Skills Questions

  • Abdul Halim Abdullah School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Baru, Johor, Malaysia.
  • Wong Jieh Tze School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Baru, Johor, Malaysia.
  • Hartini Ismail School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Baru, Johor, Malaysia.
  • Sharifah Nurarfah S.Abd Rahman School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Baru, Johor, Malaysia.
  • Mohd Hilmi Hamzah School of Languages, Civilisation & Philosophy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia.
Keywords: Mathematics education, Higher order thinking skills, HOTS, Personality, Problem solving

Abstract

This study identifies the relationship between the personality traits and achievements in solving the mathematics HOTS questions of 254 Year Six students from three primary schools in Ulu Tiram. The findings from the personality questionnaire and the mathematics HOTS question paper were an-alysed. The findings showed that the main dominant personality traits of the students were the openness followed by extraversion, neuroticism and agreeableness. For the achievement in the HOTS paper, 61 students scored highly, 55 in the very high category, and the rest were in the very low, low and medium categories. The result of regression analysis showed that the predictor of the standardised predictive coefficient of the neurotic characteristic (ᵦ = −.132) was significant, while the correlation value of students’ achievement and neurotic personality trait was 0.132. This showed that the relationship between students’ neuroticism and their achievement in solving the mathe-matics HOTS question was very low. Therefore, only neuroticism out of the five types of personality traits contributed to the achievement of Year Six students in solving the mathematics HOTS ques-tion. Hence, the findings conclude that personality traits are not the main factor affecting the achievement of the Year Six students in solving mathematics HOTS questions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd Rahman, A. (2010). Hubungan antara personaliti dan gaya pengajaran guru dengan pencapaian matematik PMR satu kajian di sekolah menengah daerah Kota Tinggi [Master’s thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia]. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Institutional Repository.

Abd Rahman, A. B. (2007). Ciri personaliti di kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah teknik berdasarkan Teori Holland [Master’s Thesis, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia]. Tunku Tun Aminah Library.

Abdul Rashid, Z. (2016). Tahap kesediaan guru dalam aspek pengetahuan dan keperluan latihan berfokuskan aplikasi KBAT [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

Abu, N. E., & Eu, L. K. (2017). Hubungan antara sikap, minat, pengajaran guru dan pengaruh rakan sebaya terhadap pencapaian matematik tambahan Tingkatan 4. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(1), 1–10.

Azizi, Y. Yusof, B., & Shahrin, H. (2008). Personaliti gaya hidup remaja. Univision Press.

Badd. (2017). Are you smarter than today’s UPSR kids? These math questions may make you think otherwise. Cilisos.my. https://cilisos.my/are-you-smarter-than-todays-upsr-kids-these-math-questions-may-make-you-think-otherwise/

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Budsankom, P., Sawangboon, T., Damrongpanit, S., & Chuensirimongkol, J. (2015). Factors affecting higher order thinking skills of students: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(19), 2639–2652.

Bujang, Z., & Yusof, Y. Z. (2015). Trait personaliti dan hubungan dengan prestasi akademik bakal guru di sebuah institusi latihan perguruan. Jurnal Bitara Edisi Khas (Psikologi Kaunseling), 8, 171–180.

Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self‐efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 78–96.

Chidozie, C. C., Libunao, W. H., Kamin, Y., & Saud, M. S. (2014). Implementing higher order thinking skills in teaching and learning of design and technology education. First Technical and Vocational Education International Seminar 2014 (TVEIS 2014).

Curriculum Development Division. (2014a). Inisiatif kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi di sekolah 2014. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Curriculum Development Division. (2014b). Elemen KBAT dalam kurikulum. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Examination Board. (2013). Pentaksiran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Ghani, M. Z., Nik Yaacob, N. R., Che Ahmad, A., Che Aman, R., & Mat Isa, Z. (2010). Differences in the emotional stability among academically talented students base on gender and different type of schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Educator and Education, 25, 153–167.

Goodykoontz, E. N. (2008). Factors that affect college students’ attitude toward mathematics [Doctorate’s Thesis, West Virginia University]. The Research Repository, West Virginia University.

Hassan, F.A., Ishak, N., Yusof. H., & Rahim, H. A. (2005). Kemiskinan dan pendidikan: perubahan minda orang Melayu ke arah kecemerlangan pendidikan akademik. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 7, 25–56.

Hazrati-Viari, A., Rad, A. T., & Torabi, S. S. (2012). The effect of personality traits on academic performance: The mediating role of academic motivation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 367–371.

Jensen, M. (2015). Personality traits, learning and academic achievements. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(4), 91–118.

John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Institute of Personality and Social Research.

Köseoğlu, Y. (2016). To what extent can the big five and learning styles predict academic achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(30), 43–51.

Mahyuddin, R. (1995). Psikologi pembelajaran. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Marcela, V. (2015). Learning strategy, personality traits and academic achievement of university students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3473–3478.

Mohd. Yunus, O., & Mohd. Derus, M. (2007). Prestasi akademik pelajar Melayu dan hubungannya dengan keinginan untuk cemer-lang dan personaliti dalaman. The 5th ASEAN Symposium on Educational Management and Leadership (ASEMAL 5).

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015: International results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). PISA 2015: Results in focus. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf.

Peng, C. F., & Hamad, Z. H. (2018). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Dalam Pembelajaran dan Pemudahcaraan Bahasa Melayu melalui Teknik Penyoalan. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 8(1), 1–12.

Perkins, A. M., Arnone, D., Smallwood, J., & Mobbs, D. (2015). Thinking too much: self-generated thought as the engine of neuroticism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(9), 492–498.

Pickering, A. D., Smillie, L. D., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Neurotic individuals are not creative thinkers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 1–2.

Power, R. A., Steinberg, S., Bjornsdottir, G., Rietveld, C. A., Abdellaoui, A., Nivard, M. M., Johannesson, M., Galesloot, T. E., Hottenga, J. J., Willemsen, G., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J., Magnusson, P. K., Ullén, F., Tiemeier, H., Hofman, A., van Rooij, F. J., Walters, G. B., Sigurdsson, E., Thorgeirsson, T. E., … Stefansson, K. (2015). Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder predict creativity. Nature Neuroscience, 18(7), 953–955.

Razali, R. (2011). Perkaitan antara personaliti pelajar dan tingkah laku pengajaran guru dengan pencapaian matematik pelajar Tingkatan Empat di Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia [Master’s Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia]. Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository.

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1–28.

Salandanan, G. G. (2009). Teacher education. Goodwill Trading Co., Inc.

Sharuji, W. N. S., Mohd Nordin, N. (2017). Kesediaan Guru Dalam Pelaksanaan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT). Simposium Pendidikan diPeribadikan: Perspektif Risalah An-Nur (SPRiN2017), 140–146.

Surif, J., Abd Ghafar, N. H., Ibrahim, N. H., & Abdullah, A. H. (2014). Penyelesaian masalah rutin dan bukan rutin dalam pendidikan matematik. Konvensyen Antarabangsa Jiwa Pendidik, 12–23.

Wan Yusop, W. M. F. (2014). Faktor yang mendorong pencapaian akademik pelajar dalam program kimpalan di Kolej Vokasional [Master’s thesis, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia]. Tunku Tun Aminah Library.

Widana, I. W., Parwata, I. M. Y., Parmithi, N. N., Jayantika, I. G. A. T., Sukendra, K., & Sumandya, I. W. (2018). Higher order thinking skills assessment towards critical thinking on mathematics lesson. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 24–32.

Yahaya, A., Ghaffar, M. N., Ismail, S., & Damiri, N. (2005). Ciri-ciri personaliti dalam pemilihan kerjaya pelajar, gaya pembelajaran pelajar dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian akademik. International Conference on Learning and Motivation.

Yusoff, H., Mohd Sarman, S., & Mahmood, A. I. (2018). Kajian penguasaan kemahiran amali sains dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian akademik bagi kursus engineering science dalam kalangan pelajar di POLISAS. National Innovation and Invention Competition Through Exhibition (iCompEx’18).

Published
2023-02-28
Section
Articles