Evaluating the Economic Feasibility of Agrivoltaic Systems: A Case Study of Solar Park Gambang
Abstract
Solar energy is a cornerstone of global decarbonization efforts, but its large land footprint creates a tradeoff between clean energy generation and competing land uses. Malaysia’s growing commitment to renewable energy has prompted exploration into land efficient technologies like agrivoltaic systems, which combine solar power generation with agricultural production. With increasing land use competition and national solar capacity targets, optimizing economic returns from such dual use systems is both timely and strategic. However, most feasibility studies have been conducted in temperate regions, leaving a gap in context specific economic assessments for tropical climates like Malaysia. Therefore, this study evaluates the economic feasibility of implementing an agrivoltaic system at the Gambang Solar Park in Malaysia. The study employed comprehensive financial modelling by incorporating capital and operational expenditures alongside revenue from solar energy, agricultural output and environmental benefits. The results indicate that the agrivoltaic system generated higher revenue although incurred greater total production costs. Nevertheless, it achieved a higher net profit of 2.41 percent more than the conventional configuration. In addition, the system demonstrated a stronger return on investment at 25 percent, a shorter payback period of 4.01 years, and an internal rate of return of 24.61 percent. These findings suggest that the agrivoltaic system offers a financially attractive and sustainable dual use land strategy within Malaysia’s renewable energy landscape.
Downloads
References
Agostini, A., Colauzzi, M., & Amaducci, S. (2021). Innovative agrivoltaic system to produce sustainable energy: An economic and environmental assessment. Applied Energy, 281, 116102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116102
Alam, H., Alam, M. A., & Butt, N. Z. (2022). Techno economic modeling for agrivoltaic: Can agrivoltaic be more profitable than ground mounted PV?. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 13(1), 174-186. doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.3215087
Barron-Gafford, G. A., Pavao-Zuckerman, M. A., Minor, R. L., Sutter, L. F., Barnett-Moreno, I., Blackett, D. T. Thompson, & Macknick, J. E. (2019). Agrivoltaics provide mutual benefits across the food–energy–water nexus in drylands. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 848-855. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0364-5
Dupraz, C., Marrou, H., Talbot, G., Dufour, L., Nogier, A., & Ferard, Y. (2011). Combining solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimising land use: Towards new agrivoltaic schemes. Renewable energy, 36(10), 2725-2732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.005
Feuerbacher, A., Herrmann, T., Neuenfeldt, S., Laub, M., & Gocht, A. (2022). Estimating the economics and adoption potential of agrivoltaics in Germany using a farm-level bottom-up approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 168, 112784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112784
Horngren, C., Harrison, W., Oliver, S., Best, P., Fraser, D., & Tan, R. (2012). Financial accounting. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Hu, Z. (2023). Towards solar extractivism? A political ecology understanding of the solar energy and agriculture boom in rural China. Energy Research & Social Science, 98, 102988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102988
International Renewable Energy Agency. (2012, June). Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series - solar photovoltaics. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2012/RE_Technologies_Cost_Analysis-SOLAR_PV.pdf?rev=21db97bd5fdc4c889780cdc2f13dbb69
Jabatan Pertanian Malaysia. (n.d). Aliran kewangan tanaman. https://www.doa.gov.my/doa/resources/aktiviti_sumber/sumber_awam/maklumat_pertanian/aliran_kewangan_tanaman_DOA.pdf
Kabir, E., Kumar, P., Kumar, S., Adelodun, A. A., & Kim, K. H. (2018). Solar energy: Potential and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 894-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.094
Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (1989). Advanced management accounting. Englewood Cliffs.
Mekhilef, S., Safari, A., Mustaffa, W. E. S., Saidur, R., Omar, R., & Younis, M. A. A. (2012). Solar energy in Malaysia: Current state and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 386-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.003
Pascaris, A. S., Schelly, C., & Pearce, J. M. (2020). A first investigation of agriculture sector perspectives on the opportunities and barriers for agrivoltaic. Agronomy, 10(12), 1885. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121885
Ravilla, A., Shirkey, G., Chen, J., Jarchow, M., Stary, O., & Celik, I. (2024). Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of agrivoltaic system (AVS) designs. Science of the Total Environment, 912, 169274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169274
Sustainable Energy Development Authority. (n.d). National renewable energy policy. https://www.seda.gov.my/policies/national-renewable-energy-policy-and-action-plan-2009/
Torma, G., & Aschemann-Witzel, J. (2023). Social acceptance of dual land use approaches: Stakeholders' perceptions of the drivers and barriers confronting agrivoltaic diffusion. Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 610-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.014
Trommsdorff, M., Hopf, M., Hörnle, O., Berwind, M., Schindele, S., & Wydra, K. (2023). Can synergies in agriculture through an integration of solar energy reduce the cost of agrivoltaics? An economic analysis in apple farming. Applied Energy, 350, 121619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121619
UiTM. (n.d). UiTM solar farm project. UiTM. https://solar.uitm.edu.my/uitm-solar-farms/















