Exploring Lecturers’ Perceptions of Gender Equity in the Educational Management of Private Higher Educational Institutions (PHEIs) in Sabah, Malaysia

  • Fung Lan Yong Postgraduate Studies, Jesselton University College, 88300 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Florence Chuah Inclusive GEMS Consultancy, 46200 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Frederick Chen Tshung Chong Department of Social Science and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 97000 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Steward G. Stephen Department of Social Science and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 97000 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Chung Jin Jong Centre for Postgraduate Studies, North Borneo University, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Loreta Ling Ling Uie Business Studies, Jesselton University College, 88300 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
Keywords: Educational Management, Gender Equity, Lecturers’ Perceptions, Private Higher Educational Institutions (PHEIs), Sabah, Malaysia

Abstract

Gender equity in the educational management of higher education in Malaysia is often shaped by structural, operational, and sociocultural factors. While female students and female academic staff dominate in absolute numbers, the highest echelons of executive leadership in higher education remain substantially male-dominated.  The primary purpose of this study was to explore lecturers’ perceptions of gender equity in the educational management of private higher educational institutions (PHEIs) in Sabah, Malaysia. The sample consisted of 61 lecturers from four PHEIs in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, who responded to the Gender Equality Questionnaire on Google Forms.  Data were subsequently transferred onto a spreadsheet and analyzed using SPSS 29.0.  First, percentages of agreement on perceived gender equity were calculated.  Second, Kruskal-Wallis H test was conducted to determine if there were any significant differences in relation to age and job experience, while Mann-Whitney U test was run to determine if there were any significant differences in terms of gender. Third, Wilcoxon signed rank test was conducted to determine if any of the items significantly differed from the hypothesized value of 3.5. Findings imply that only low to average proportions of PHEI lecturers tend to strongly agree/agree that gender equity exists in the educational management of their organization, which are supported by previous research.  On the other hand, Mann-Whitney U test indicated that significant gender differences tend to exist in perceived gender equity at p < .05.  In contrast, Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed nonsignificant differences in perceived gender equity by way of age and job experience. Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed that 25 of the items significantly differed from the hypothesized value of 3.5 at p < .001, while eight significantly differed from the same hypothesized value at p < .05.  In light of the findings, some recommendations were made on ways to enhance gender equity in the educational management of PHEIs in Malaysia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Academik America. (2026, March 6). Give to gain: Strengthening women’s leadership through education. Academik America. https://www.academikamerica.com/blog/give-to-gain-strengthening-womens-leadership-through-education

Azlan, N. N. A., Sulong, R., Abdullah, N. K., Zahari, A. S. M., Harun, N. S., & Setapa, M. (2025). Gender equality on leadership effectiveness among women in higher educational institutions: A preliminary study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(11), 1430-1440.http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i11/26860

Badrolhisam, N. I., Omar, N., & Achim, N. (2022). Perceived traits for future women academic leaders in Malaysian higher education institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management and Sciences, 11(1), 262–284. 10.6007/IJAREMS/v11-i1/11692

Barnacle, R., Sidelil, L. T., Cuthbert, D., & Latham, K. (2026). Gender equality in higher education: Can leaders drive change? Higher Education Research & Development, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2026.2638277

Berezhna, G. V., Aleinikova, O. V., Kovtun, O. A., Danylchuk, H.B., Babenko, V. O., & Nechypurenko, P. P. (2025). Educational technology for gender mainstreaming in project management: Advances in training approaches and digital tools. CTE Workshop Proceedings [Online], 12, 498–544. https://acnsci.org/journal/index.php/cte/article/view/669

Chakanyuka, V. B., & Gono, E. N. (2025). Women educational leaders’ challenges in financial administration: Narratives from Harare female school heads. European Journal of Education, 12, 355-360. 10.46827/ejes.v12i9.6209

Diaz, D. (2024, October 10). Empowering women in education with leadership development. SmartBrief. https://www.smartbrief.com/original/empowering-women-in-education-with-leadership-development

European Trade Union Committee for Education. (2009). ETUCE survey on gender equality in the education sector, the teaching profession and within teacher trade unions. https://www.csee-etuce.org/en/item/6786:gender-equality-survey-report-parts-i-ii-and-iv-final-enpdf

Eyüpoğlu Ş. (2024, February 20). Let’s celebrate the qualities women bring to higher education leadership. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/lets-celebrate-qualities-women-bring-higher-education-leadership

Ghundol, B., & Muthanna, A. (2025). Perceptions and experiences of female academics on barriers in obtaining and continuing leadership roles at higher education.International Journal of Educational Research, 130, 102534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102534.

Ilie, C., Carlos, J., & Quintana, M. (2023). Is sustainable management education contributing to gender equality? The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3),100886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100886

Jones, S. (2024, February 16). Three ways to support women’s career progression in higher education. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/three-ways-support-womens-career-progression-higher-education

Kairys, M. R. (2018). The influence of gender on leadership in education management. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(5), 931-941. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2017-0094

Kaur, S. (2019). Gender and leadership in research universities in Malaysia: The case of University of Malaya. In D. E. Neubauer and S. Kaur (eds.), Gender and the changing face of higher education in Asia Pacific (pp. 127-143). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02795-7_9

Minister of Higher Education Malaysia. (2020). Macro higher education institutions. Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education. https://www.mohe.gov.my/muat- turun/statistik/2020/492-statistik-pendidikan-tinggi-2020-03-bab-1-makro-institusipendidikan-tinggi/file

Miralles-Cardona, C. (2025). Teaching gender equality in teacher education: Does existing practice actually support gender mainstreaming implementation? Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1570115

Mustofa, Karya, D. F., & Halim, A. (2021). Indonesian students’ perception of gender equity in education. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(4), 185-196.

Nhlumayo, B. S., & Ngubane, S. A. (2025). Challenges and opportunities for females in educational leadership: Perspectives from departmental heads in South African schools. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 13(2), 129-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.16344

Nehoda, Y., Piast, N., Nosovets, N., Belan, T., & Rozhkova, L. (2024). Achieving gender equity in present-day educational settings. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7, 2024spe013. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe013

Nevada Commission for Women. (n. d.). Gender Equality Survey. https://www.admin.nv.gov/siteassets/content/boards/women/meetings/2019/NCFW_Women_Gender_Equality_Survey.pdf

Nyoni, W. P., & He, C. (2019). The status of gender in senior leadership positions in higher education universities in Tanzania. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR), 3(3), 56-68. www.ijeais.org/ijamr

O'Connor, K. (Ed.). (2010). Gender and women's leadership: A reference handbook. Sage Publications. https://sk.sagepub.com/hnbk/edvol/womensleadership/front-matter/d14#_

O’Connor, P., & Irvine, G. (2020). Multi-level state interventions and gender equality in higher education institutions: The Irish case. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040098

Okoro (2025) Othman, N., Rahman, R. S., Abdullah, N., & Ramly, R. (2023). Female leadership in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. Asian Women, 39(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2023.12.39.1.1

Othman, S., & A. Hamid, A. H. (2023). Exploring women’s transformational leadership style and competency: A higher education Malaysia perspective. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(2), 244-256. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i2.22237

Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. https://www.amazon.com/Fundamental-Statistics Behavioral-International-processes/dp/0030919347

RUBIKTOP. (2023, September 14). The magic number 30: Why a sample size of 30 is often considered sufficient for statistical significance. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/magic-number-30-why-sample-size-often-considered-sufficient/

Sahin, E. (2014). Gender equity in education. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 59-63. 10.4236/jss.2014.21007.

Sánchez, C. M., & Lehnert, K. (2019). The unbearable heaviness of leadership: The effects of competency, negatives, and experience on women's aspirations to leadership. Journal of Business Research, 95, 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.033.

Shava, G. N., Manokore, K., Muzari, T., Gwebu, N, Hlongwane, J., & Ruvengo, L. (2023). The paradox of leadership and gender, women in higher education management: The Zimbabwean perspective. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 7(1), 201-218. 10.47772/IJRISS

Sherazi, M., & Khalid, S. (2024). Student perception of gender equality: A comparison by gender subject and locality. The Knowledge, 3(1), 60-67. 10.63062/tk/2k24a.31041

Superville, D. R. (2024, April 27). 7 ways districts can increase the number of women leaders. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/7-ways-districts-can-increase-the-number-of-women-leaders/2023/04

Syahirah, S., Puteh, F., Azmi, Z., & Ismail, H. (2026). Towards better gender equality (SDG5): A snapshot of women's leadership representation within Malaysian public universities setting. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 22(1), 21-39. 10.24191/ajue.v22i1.002

The Equileap Team. (2019). Gender equality in the workplace questionnaire 2019 edition. https://equileap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Equileap-Questionnaire-2019.pdf

Unin, N. (2014). Learning to lead for Malay women in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 654-659. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.114

Wang, Y. (2025). Gender differences in higher education: Educational policy recommendations from a psychological perspective. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 99(1). 10.54254/2753-7048/2025.24339

Zeliang, L., & Malakar, D. (2024). Exploring gender equity and empowerment in education the context of Nagaland. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 1625–1634. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024

Published
2026-06-25
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3